Mail Archives: geda-user/2013/01/17/11:05:36

X-Authentication-Warning: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113;
X-Received: by with SMTP id i10mr5222236vdf.128.1358438717485;
Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:05:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Ben Gamari <bgamari DOT foss AT gmail DOT com>
To: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>, geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] geda-skeleton-project: Lowering the cost of a starting a gEDA project
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <87wqvhd4tw DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <859D19F5-2072-408E-9632-324C2C943163 AT noqsi DOT com> <87bocrviz3 DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <40E88AEA-9556-40D5-9567-9DEFCAFFBCFA AT noqsi DOT com> <201301170126 DOT r0H1QVNO006895 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <90674A9C-F296-412F-A99C-372DDA7C70F0 AT noqsi DOT com> <201301170331 DOT r0H3VHsL022134 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3BC32DEF-2C9E-4FE3-BE18-1B65A4139C65 AT noqsi DOT com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+240~g0ab5e9f ( Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:05:15 -0500
Message-ID: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> writes:

> On Jan 16, 2013, at 8:31 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> New gEDA users want the easiest/fastest path that results in them
>> getting their project done.
> Yes, exactly. What if pcb isn't the right tool for that? In my
> opinion, based on experience, it probably isn't in many cases.
I've been sitting out thusfar but I feel I should note that I disagree
with your assessment of pcb. In my experience, pcb, after an initial
learning period, is an extremely productive environment for my needs. Of
the projects in this space that I have experience with (admittedly quite
few: Kicad, Eagle, and pcb), pcb has by far been the best tool for the
job (especially among FOSS offerings). That's not to say that it is
without issues but I have yet to find a design for which it proves to
be inadequate.

I understand that others may have a different view on this, but I
think it's fair to say that there exists a number of people who happily
use pcb as their layout tool of choice. Where the majority stands on
this issue I do not know.

>>  If the first thing we tell them is to find some other software
>> package to get their job done, we are doing ourselves a huge
>> disservice.
> If the first impression that they get is that they must use something
> that they are likely to find unusable, we do both them and ourselves a
> huge disservice.
> If we downplay gEDA's unique strengths, particularly its ability to
> export designs to most common layout and simulation systems, we do
> both them and ourselves a huge disservice.
I didn't mention the fact that gEDA can target multiple downstream tools
as I wanted to present a simple interface, which appears to be what
my audience expects. That being said, I can add a bit to the README
mentioning the existence of other tools this would help.

Out of curiosity, what is your preferred layout tool?


- Ben

- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019