delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2013/01/16/20:12:48

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] geda-skeleton-project: Lowering the cost of a starting a gEDA project
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <87bocrviz3.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:11:52 -0700
Message-Id: <40E88AEA-9556-40D5-9567-9DEFCAFFBCFA@noqsi.com>
References: <87wqvhd4tw DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com> <859D19F5-2072-408E-9632-324C2C943163 AT noqsi DOT com> <87bocrviz3 DOT fsf AT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id r0H1C0rt032545
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Jan 14, 2013, at 9:15 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:

>> 
>> Since this is pcb-centric rather than geda-centric, I think it would be better to call it "pcb-skeleton-project".
>> 
> Hmm, I'm not entirely sure I agree. By "gEDA" I mean gSchem, PCB, and
> the associated glue utilities.

"pcb" has a separate code base, different file formats, and different UI. It started as an independent development. I don't consider it part of gEDA. gEDA can export schematics to a wide variety of layout programs (ASIC as well as printed circuit). The inflexibility of "pcb" makes it dependent on gEDA (or are there still xcircuit users around?). gEDA's usefulness is independent of any particular downstream flow. 

I find gEDA easy to use, and I found it easy to learn all those years ago. I've also tried to learn "pcb", and found it a very frustrating experience. OK, maybe that's me. But a couple of years ago I tasked an engineer, familiar with CAD, to learn it. He failed, too. My customers have little trouble tweaking my designs in gEDA, but not one has adopted "pcb". And then, there are the geda-user and geda-help groups, where gEDA users have few issues but "pcb" users have many.

> Certainly, the end product will be a
> PCB layout

But, based on the evidence above, I think most people who can choose will not choose "pcb" for PCB layout with gEDA.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019