Mail Archives: geda-user/2012/12/21/17:21:17
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 18:39 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:32:19PM +0000, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 13:21 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> >
> > > I can believe it. I really considered your previous patch a regression,
> > > but color differentiation is going forward.
> >
> > Did you get a chance to try it out yet?
>
> I was just trying but had a problem. Cloning the repository worked but:
>
> git checkout for_master origin/for_master
>
> as you said in a previous message failed!
What was the error message?
What branches are listed with
git branch
and
git branch -r
> I first tried to navigate the repository with "gitk --all" and got
> lost: too many rebases.
--all is confusing for repositories using stgit, as there is a lot of
churn in the .stgit branches.
I use a shell script I call "gitkall", contaning:
gitk $(git show-ref | grep -v ".stgit" | grep -v "patches/") $@
That filters out the stgit stuff.
> However, the result of the clone includes the relevant patch
> (the RATFOUND one), so I compiled and installed it.
You might have one of my own branches then... it probably contains a lot
of other cruft which you won't want, including changes to mouse wheel
bindings, experimental GL rendering etc..
> I'm really pleased with the result; it does not adversely affect
> my workflow, just the opposite, improving it somewhat (nothing
> revolutionary, but noticeable in some cases).
>
> For me it's a thumbs up!
Nice.. I'll have to make it a little bit more configurable, and figure
out whether the "FOUND" flag should be applied to every object, or just
the connected ones..., then I can push it.
Regards,
--
Peter Clifton <peter DOT clifton AT clifton-electronics DOT co DOT uk>
Clifton Electronics
- Raw text -