delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2012/12/21/17:21:17

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.ucs.cam.ac.uk/email/scanner/
Message-ID: <1356128362.2796.3.camel@localhost>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines - summary
From: Peter Clifton <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 22:19:22 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20121221173921.GA25742@visitor2.iram.es>
References: <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212120740300 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv>
<CAN0Jx-_+HNgHFNwjNkZRos--yRa9KWLeijjaE7zh5imjp5omuw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212150453530 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv>
<CAN0Jx-8mr2XmLHr7AzcTygk205H1H4_X1Y9VcQHw3zia5eGynQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<CAN-_CWyXNvnumf5OC+m-xRV0zMf3cCvyzLU3be_pC8DkNVZG0Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<1355861174 DOT 13534 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost>
<20121220101819 DOT GA26060 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
<1356003432 DOT 4776 DOT 10 DOT camel AT localhost>
<20121220122149 DOT GB20493 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
<1356100339 DOT 17857 DOT 0 DOT camel AT localhost>
<20121221173921 DOT GA25742 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 18:39 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 02:32:19PM +0000, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 13:21 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > 
> > > I can believe it. I really considered your previous patch a regression,
> > > but color differentiation is going forward.
> > 
> > Did you get a chance to try it out yet?
> 
> I was just trying but had a problem. Cloning the repository worked but:
> 
> git checkout for_master origin/for_master
> 
> as you said in a previous message failed!

What was the error message?

What branches are listed with 

git branch

and

git branch -r

> I first tried to navigate the repository with "gitk --all" and got
> lost: too many rebases.

--all is confusing for repositories using stgit, as there is a lot of
churn in the .stgit branches.

I use a shell script I call "gitkall", contaning:

gitk $(git show-ref | grep -v ".stgit" | grep -v "patches/") $@

That filters out the stgit stuff.


> However, the result of the clone includes the relevant patch
> (the RATFOUND one), so I compiled and installed it.

You might have one of my own branches then... it probably contains a lot
of other cruft which you won't want, including changes to mouse wheel
bindings, experimental GL rendering etc..

> I'm really pleased with the result; it does not adversely affect
> my workflow, just the opposite, improving it somewhat (nothing
> revolutionary, but noticeable in some cases).
> 
> For me it's a thumbs up!

Nice.. I'll have to make it a little bit more configurable, and figure
out whether the "FOUND" flag should be applied to every object, or just
the connected ones..., then I can push it.

Regards,

-- 
Peter Clifton <peter DOT clifton AT clifton-electronics DOT co DOT uk>

Clifton Electronics

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019