Mail Archives: geda-user/2012/12/20/18:53:13

X-Authentication-Warning: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
Message-ID: <1356047475.5629.4.camel@localhost>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines - summary
From: Peter Clifton <pcjc2 AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:51:15 +0000
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
<1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212120740300 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv>
<CAN0Jx-_+HNgHFNwjNkZRos--yRa9KWLeijjaE7zh5imjp5omuw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212150453530 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv>
<CAN0Jx-8mr2XmLHr7AzcTygk205H1H4_X1Y9VcQHw3zia5eGynQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<CAN-_CWyXNvnumf5OC+m-xRV0zMf3cCvyzLU3be_pC8DkNVZG0Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<1355861174 DOT 13534 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost>
<20121220101819 DOT GA26060 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
<1356003432 DOT 4776 DOT 10 DOT camel AT localhost>
<20121220122149 DOT GB20493 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es>
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 13:21 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:

> Well, some of my designs were broken by PCB upgrades, in the area of 
> copper pours if I remember correctly. I always keep the photoplotter 
> files I send to the manufacturer just in case I need a new batch (and 
> in one case it was useful since the manufacturer of the first batch 
> went bankrupt), but if I had to modify it...

That I'm interested about.. if you have test cases you can share (even
privately), let me know.

Was this breakage a long time ago, around the time polygon support was
changed from dumb flood-fill, to our current connectivity aware
behaviour which keeps the largest clipped piece only?

I know of some designs which were broken by that change. The breakage
boils down to the fact that the "fullpoly" flag (which was introduced
much later), should have been implemented with that original change, and
defaulted to on, at least for polygons in files prior to the version
where the new behaviour was added. This would preserve the old geometry.

If it wasn't related to this change (which I know about, and cannot
fix), I'm very interested to see examples.

> > > > Try the split-colouring, and see what you think. I'm also going to
> > > > experiment with de-saturating colours or increasing transparency on
> > > > non-found objects in the GL renderer, to see how that feels.
> > > 
> > > I will try over the week-end. I feel that split colouring might 
> > > work well enough.
> > 
> > The idea is that it is an improvement over both old and current
> > behaviours ;)
> I can believe it. I really considered your previous patch a regression,
> but color differentiation is going forward.

Yes - that change was well intentioned, but not well thought out. I
mentally associated a different "correct" behaviour with that function
than it previously had, and failed to take into account what people
already used it for.


Peter Clifton <peter DOT clifton AT clifton-electronics DOT co DOT uk>

Clifton Electronics

- Raw text -

  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019