X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh=
	BRX6WjnqfHS4SI1g4AF0c/pLGmiW0ah/t1bprlvNOPM=; b=pWu9rSpwCuCscBai
	qq5XT3M5rnYg4Sm1atSvYMcGrs+XA0/kRmSmntC7pv4tnW7Ryv2COeCyVvdqbJzE
	G0KcwiZVbFHKOXKgDy06ldecbA50XUI2ovh1xmippvcNJf1yC5px7FtFdZ15tDEW
	YwSry4v//vZEZL2tUY/1wnMT4/M=
Message-ID:	<50D1F879.2030101@jump-ing.de>
Date:	Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:25:13 +0100
From:	Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Find rat lines - summary
References:	<20121204183305 DOT 6b04c0dc AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <20121208112649 DOT 388a9d22 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <1355011808 DOT 19390 DOT 8 DOT camel AT localhost> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212120740300 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <CAN0Jx-_+HNgHFNwjNkZRos--yRa9KWLeijjaE7zh5imjp5omuw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1212150453530 DOT 26605 AT igor2priv> <CAN0Jx-8mr2XmLHr7AzcTygk205H1H4_X1Y9VcQHw3zia5eGynQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAN-_CWyXNvnumf5OC+m-xRV0zMf3cCvyzLU3be_pC8DkNVZG0Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1355861174 DOT 13534 DOT 14 DOT camel AT localhost>
In-Reply-To:	<1355861174.13534.14.camel@localhost>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Am 18.12.2012 21:06, schrieb Peter Clifton:
>> It was a fantastic tool... I could use 'F' without the rats nest
>> >showing to highlight only connected copper, or I could use 'O' -> 'F'
>> >to highlight all the copper that needed to be connected...
>
> I realised that trick recently, and had I done so before would perhaps
> have not bothered with the change.
>
> HOWEVER.. the ability to erase / restore the rats nest might go away at
> some point in the future if we ever sort out continuous real-time
> rats-optimisation, so I'm hesitant to suggest people start relying on
> it.

Unless I'm missing something, 'F' could be limited to search an visible 
rat lines layer only, so one can continue with this trick by 
hiding/unhiding this layer. To get more of the current behaviour, this 
layer could be hidden automatically by the search for shorts procedure.

I've tested with the last release, 'F' apparently takes hidden rat lines 
into accout just as much as visible ones.


Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/

- Raw text -