X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=jDnYZntIEuLfgR+0Fpgq9ybm+C+iuqyTv1WEbfSrwCk=;
	b=KHM8nMzk+0VRmVJHOXml1bHBBPbGBy/n6Macg63eybTcIsYux5sTgD3E2rbGMXwve0
	uSlMGBZ+6JDiqA9SxritiWROSrunUIfN9eIEmafh8c3MTLdo+vDM7uoTajFPs1b8vaVI
	+AZ2IDToC/R7FyXB6waOhLgGiwHjhMLb3sf6jplFyZmXI9fm0d8IHeZ+cu9UQE04+/Sx
	kTH2QZ5B/LybOA8PD+yzLg/xuoah3wW+G1b+tGXl0EK8HW6dzH2fAkNZGHbYuwS+FZEK
	ATL0TPgXq0HREbi9u5AsZSv1q/Xu8dxzhx+YYX80IYOYHp77Q55ozkhsISNI80I9ZxLD
	F7qg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<ka7650$fvd$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<1354748372 DOT 3386 DOT 3 DOT camel AT AMD64X2>
	<k9sr8u$29l$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<1354900205 DOT 3512 DOT 34 DOT camel AT AMD64X2>
	<CAC4O8c8bxN6gphbG6afG=nU8Twp-xcZZHMwTtwn=viV3=evEOg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAAOVysEQWd17jEkYXGcJ3oo6e4i3a8RtZ+6xykRddDP+ExaC=w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201212080002 DOT qB802iXg022341 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<87k3stclr3 DOT fsf AT gag DOT com>
	<50C4AAA0 DOT 2050200 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<201212091922 DOT qB9JMc63002780 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<50C6120F DOT 5000701 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<1355179738 DOT 4108 DOT 8 DOT camel AT AMD64X2>
	<ka7650$fvd$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:39:35 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAN0Jx-90mesd=OTuZQ2cR7FmC=PNCyAmmb1CvDmOXsbhz3uspQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Router fun with rubberbands
From:	Russell Dill <Russ DOT Dill AT asu DOT edu>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQmXOcNr5j2WrufNlsouZBzXCaWdw7EebmofAO0YvFm4Vjz0XXgp/mufO3qyJGVHLyplYKxw
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
<knaak AT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de> wrote:
> Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
>> If there is unused capacity,
>> we may try to move components together to reduce PCB area and trace
>> length.
>
> IMHO, a rubberband approach would be good for this task too. Imagine, all
> tracks are made of tensioned rubber. Then you let go of the components.
> ---> Twang! The layout shrinks to half the size.
>
> For extra nerdiness, allow the components to adjust their angle, too :-)
>
> Seriously, such a automatic layout shrinking algorithm may be a winner in
> many real world scenarios.

Footprint courtyards would be really handy here.

- Raw text -