X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
Message-ID:	<50A90BC7.8080901@neurotica.com>
Date:	Sun, 18 Nov 2012 11:24:39 -0500
From:	Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Thoughts on gschem UI
References:	<50A688B8 DOT 4090809 AT neurotica DOT com> <CC923058-B962-45B5-973D-EA03906430B9 AT noqsi DOT com> <50A6A265 DOT 6050300 AT neurotica DOT com> <4E8E6F31-EF8D-4540-BA86-7935C1C3E6D8 AT noqsi DOT com> <50A6A95C DOT 5030903 AT neurotica DOT com> <355DEF4F-51BB-44A8-A5F4-D8564E7E7885 AT noqsi DOT com> <20121116213601 DOT 13718 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <66889AAB-3A82-4861-ACB0-B35A876EF6F4 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c8s3837dD5so1hu-QOm8PW69sehVNNX7njQvnRGzXODGw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <B63F900B-2C12-48A4-AD4B-5A616078030B AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c9BAJe8_7KLL8aaGq30HCkj+q74DB9jywXRXogJzdqNzw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <50A83AAA DOT 6060500 AT jump-ing DOT de> <B1A7C9C1-5EAE-49AB-A03A-D5D4AFD3B0C0 AT noqsi DOT com> <50A8615E DOT 2080800 AT neurotica DOT com> <05730E0F-4DA1-47C8-80BB-5D4F37EFD94E AT noqsi DOT com> <50A8675D DOT 30509 AT neurotica DOT com> <565D7E6F-DC3C-42E8-A069-519129E281BF AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<565D7E6F-DC3C-42E8-A069-519129E281BF@noqsi.com>
X-Enigmail-Version:	1.4.5
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 11/18/2012 06:26 AM, John Doty wrote:
>>> I'm the guy who is advocating caution here, remember? I'm asking that
>>> gschem not be damaged, that any drastic change be in the context of a
>>> new tool.
>>
>>  Ok.  So will you be writing this new tool?
> 
> No, I think *you* should. You're the one who's asking for drastic changes.

  Actually I'm not.  In fact, I don't think I asked for any changes AT
ALL.  You're the one who keeps poo-pooing everything because it doesn't
look like a "modern GUI". (as if that's some sort of legitimate metric
for good software)

  In fact, everything you've been saying is contradictory.

    - gEDA is great, don't change a thing
    - ...except for that complete rewrite that I claim is needed
    - It sucks because its GUI isn't "modern"
    - But it must not be changed because I won't be able to work anymore

  Come ON.

  At least offer a list of suggestions, in specific terms, of what you
think should be done.  If that list contains a single item, "nothing",
then stop complaining about the GUI!

              -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -