X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.0 cv=StQSGYy0 c=1 sm=0 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:17 a=jl9P3j1e7_0A:10 a=2xJ3G-9csIsA:10 a=w3sROtzhXrMA:10 a=6WB07kdHjWAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wR-FlJDvAAAA:8 a=5Hx6j1VwSDrjBoG5StUA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=6jktZp3dcHAl1vye2O6wCg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score:	0
X-Originating-IP:	70.113.67.117
Message-ID:	<4FFD92CB.1040108@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Jul 2012 09:50:51 -0500
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120510 Icedove/10.0.4
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] One big vs. a few smaller sym's for MCU's
References:	<20120709210244 DOT 60387819FB92 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <87liisbbr8 DOT fsf AT gag DOT com> <20120710134503 DOT A63E2819FBA0 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <87pq83a5rj DOT fsf AT gag DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<87pq83a5rj.fsf@gag.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 07/10/2012 12:24 PM, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Once you're past 100 pins or so on the device, breaking them up by
> function so that you can have for example a page in the schematic that's
> about the power supply, one that's about external memory interfaces, one
> that's about network interfacing, etc etc etc, that can seem quite
> useful... and make it worth the slightly larger effort of creating and
> maintaining a set of symbols.
>
> That's my take on it, at least.

I think similarly -- separate sections of one chip is for a logical arrangement
of schematic without caring about layout yet.

I like the idea of being ready with the small package symbols to
add a feature set and peripherals to a design and have the minimum set of wires stay the same.

John

- Raw text -