X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=0cZ8hF3NVwn/2OquObym3rmtjYQ/Rty4/dmbB43hENw=;
	b=UOQotLd3ERHPYxFxkzjOgx9Oo1CtlvmLrj7K+RMGZt8oyCBtNhWNmSqiZImBYd/GeY
	Ot1GXoILZ3TmWZkH+V2olo+I2vo8jvCzvSvfeUxzdylAmiOcByGJucCnJBlpEzFKkZkK
	jnzsX1L66sz/BX6NH7tnoyvmkH13COS/GCCG+Ey2jaRkphX2A5jt+5MwXnuD2prjeLnE
	rg02gW9AKQ0Uzj5BfI3C0C8kukXIcSMsH2yU0cPe+rxGp0FnnUIg437+Nqwos9QE3nX0
	irgC3x7AIaETLIaA97VZjYKjvIY4ypDCio8fEuma9sOj65F0VAO+GHnC3x6cL+5p510O
	hk8g==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201207071529.q67FTdlm006386@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<CACPio-4Ve75nB97dSTA2mh6RBCY9HNd3JaLUNVQ=WtkUVfY1WA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1341673236 DOT 2450 DOT 4 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
	<1341674662 DOT 2794 DOT 5 DOT camel AT AMD64X2 DOT fritz DOT box>
	<201207071529 DOT q67FTdlm006386 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 7 Jul 2012 12:29:39 -0400
Message-ID:	<CACPio-7rP9XaQQCSOWLUQgX65JjjLMJGxdb2AUmpxW9rYRwo4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Route style defaults
From:	Nathan Stewart <therealnathanstewart AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Edit->Route Styles does not Edit anything. It only selects the current
route style, for which there is a always displayed radio box.

Hide Everything isn't simply coddling users. It's also known as
'abstraction', and is a welcome departure from the days of Xfig. I do
think that the trace widths of the four routing styles are
conceptually related to the Design Rules though. If I were to switch
fab houses or switch to a four layer board (which has different rules
at batchpcb), then I'd likely want them to change with the new rules.

Can the optimizer handle polygons? or just traces? I was able to
reduce the complex hole in my polygon by playing the the clearance
around traces and pads, but it still has a lot of ugliness remaining
in the polygon.

- Raw text -