X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=XEcWa+ElFtNkUAARem5AEroylDin8N9BUv9XhckFQco=;
	b=gLVYArzrYQ7QyDk2FfAAOH0tjTm72MpbBar1k8tWkxMApNi9jNFVtx5avI8De528HI
	Ri9Uex9WVjBuQecsYW9KNpaF3yZsl/ZwNDrc0O/swwTBfmFE4K5jJ1e3t5Io9XROQTsB
	AH2AStWZmrKIBf6ZnONjSD+TEKrE1pobOYkRw9fHSs+Ztiq7p++CewbWNgj2WErYoRgu
	hhf6YvQMAbpdEn0DLYCGG59inzqgbDV3f3G2TOENnkXV/xi0RS8Fom6MOSs9ZavvE3px
	cuv3LWQO2GNN4/s8k5aSReZEez3PvDywxhV/3jB/Fw3pcUWCuWdeg37kaSyTU0GFpKAc
	ohSw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<4FF3BA13.5000102@gmail.com>
References:	<4FF3BA13 DOT 5000102 AT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Jul 2012 22:18:58 -0700
Message-ID:	<CAN0Jx--W9_BoT5Lb-PQ-oGReCYYW5G5Y9QCxLULhPAd=k6+ZMg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Solder Mask Invert - Gerber Export
From:	Russell Dill <Russ DOT Dill AT asu DOT edu>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQmRUzFQIWRb3DlMp2cHT8YBm4y4omA2F3UQB3lGmAK05SeaPFt8aFFWci/2MqmkX1dfNCDz
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Tim van Boxtel <tim DOT vanboxtel AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a way to invert the solder mask during a gerber export using the
> most recent pcb release?
>
> The gerber exporter always creates a negative of the final solder mask.  I
> am trying out a hobby batch pcb service, osh park, with a simple 2-layer
> board with no solder mask openings on the rear side. The online bot
> processing my project is complaining that my rear solder mask layer is
> empty, which it is!  I want the entire surface masked.  To date, this
> negative has been understood by all of the manufacturers that I have dealt
> with.  I am thinking this may be a bug with the bot interface, but I would
> like to make sure.
>
> A search of the mailing list turned up some threads from many years ago,
> hinting at this, but the functionality has seem to have been lost.  Is there
> an easy way to do this?

The OSH park bot is pretty new, just talk to laen, he'll fix the bot.

- Raw text -