Mail Archives: geda-user/2023/03/21/19:28:19
Vladimir:
> Karl:
> > Vladimir:
> > ...
> >> Unlike in previous C code, processing of short options is dropped
> >> as they were intended only for using as command line options and
> >> other using is not documented.
> >>
> >> So I'm not going to change it. Moreover, the project rc files are
> >> subject to be replaced with standard lepton configuration files,
> >> lepton.conf and such.
> > ...
> >
> > Soo, what happened with:
> >>> Our approach is just doing reliable changes on each step
> >>> trying to avoid stressing our users :-)
>
> :-) I think it's unreliable to rely on undocumented features.
I think it was sufficiently documented in 2012 for me to use it:
$ git log gsch2pcb
commit a523dad710de78a730c67f408eb8561194aadcd3
Author: Karl Hammar <karl AT aspodata DOT se>
Date: Sun Nov 8 19:33:24 2015 +0100
rm unused
commit a7349b92fc9159be84005a55baebd9a9a5df4d29
Author: Karl Hammar <karl AT aspodata DOT se>
Date: Fri Aug 17 22:13:31 2012 +0200
my ~/.gEDA files so you can reproduce my designs
> > I don't see the point of changing the rc file. It is more
> > reasonable to do the change when it is converted to standard
> > lepton conf. files.
>
> We're towards it. The sooner we (re)write/review related code the
> faster it happens. (I, for one, don't like releases with intermediate
> results which confuse the users.)
Well, apply the patch then.
> > Nevermind, just change the "Unknown config key" to something
> > more user friendly.
>
> What would you suggest? Will "Unknown config key (short config keys are
> no longer supported)" do?
Don't know, it just seems an unnessesary change for no gain. It took me
a while to hunt it down. You'll get rid of it when you convert to your
config files, so what's the hurry, just let legacy be legacy.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
- Raw text -