X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType:	repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder:	inbox
From:	"karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Unknown config key
In-reply-to:	<87355xyjnm.fsf@lepton.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
References:	<20230319120044 DOT 4EA0585F61DE AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20230320112351 DOT 68F568497643 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <87355xyjnm DOT fsf AT lepton DOT mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Comments:	In-reply-to "vzh (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
	message dated "Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:32:35 +0300."
Mime-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<20230321210043.1EEB68497643@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date:	Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:00:43 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned:	ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Vladimir:
...
>   Unlike in previous C code, processing of short options is dropped
>   as they were intended only for using as command line options and
>   other using is not documented.
> 
> So I'm not going to change it.  Moreover, the project rc files are
> subject to be replaced with standard lepton configuration files,
> lepton.conf and such.
...

Soo, what happened with:
>> Our approach is just doing reliable changes on each step
>> trying to avoid stressing our users :-) 

I don't see the point of changing the rc file. It is more
reasonable to do the change when it is converted to standard
lepton conf. files.

Nevermind, just change the "Unknown config key" to something
more user friendly.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

- Raw text -