X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.9.0 07/11/2018 (debian 1:2.9.0-1) with nmh-1.7.1
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType:	repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder:	inbox
From:	"karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] tools for sub pcbs
In-reply-to:	<87y1nvz5s0.fsf@lepton.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
References:	<20230314184208 DOT 7302885F61C5 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <87y1nvz5s0 DOT fsf AT lepton DOT mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Comments:	In-reply-to "vzh (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
	message dated "Fri, 17 Mar 2023 19:33:56 +0300."
Mime-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<20230317183608.91AEC85F61C8@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date:	Fri, 17 Mar 2023 19:36:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned:	ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Vladimir:
> We suffer from the same problem: the lack of testing and collaboration.
> You may read it as: "lack of man power in our (particular) projects".
> I'm still slowly working on lepton side to refactor sch2pcb and make it
> (maybe much) simpler.  At least, to make code testable.  Though better
> would be to replace it with something more capable.
> 
> Please see here:
> 
> https://github.com/lepton-eda/lepton-eda/pull/1008

Why then don't we cooperate on making sch2pcb great ?
Do you want to convert it to scheme or still doing things in C ?
Tell me your plans with it.

I'll spend time on this next week.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

- Raw text -