delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Virus-Scanned: | by amavisd-new (Uni-Kiel/l1ms-sc) |
From: | "=?utf-8?Q?Stephan_B=C3=B6ttcher?= (geda AT psjt DOT org) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | "Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" |
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> | |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Connecting pads directly to polygons |
In-Reply-To: | <48f8fe1f-b377-be59-6493-5d61140fdc13@linetec.nl> (Richard |
Rasker's message of "Mon, 6 Mar 2023 09:34:11 +0100") | |
References: | <xncz5nvzvd DOT fsf AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> |
<0350ae12-d97f-3fc0-f146-c83066c0e695 AT linetec DOT nl> | |
<CAJZxidB2RihL-CwFDUuaG9tnkUz-yNeQrRqaFaGZYQKR-c8Tww AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<48f8fe1f-b377-be59-6493-5d61140fdc13 AT linetec DOT nl> | |
Date: | Mon, 06 Mar 2023 18:30:16 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <s6nmt4pn5xz.fsf@psjt.org> |
User-Agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-CAU-From-Signature: | expires=1678728618 signature=a20d3a69b810e48ee4ad4c910051366183ac7c47 |
X-MIME-Autoconverted: | from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id 326HUuPI015077 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Moin, "Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> writes: > - Short circuits are currently not flagged by DRC, but only by > pressing 'O' (optimizing rat's nest) -- while I'd say that an > unintended short is certainly a design rule violation. I have in > fact been bitten by this arguably Very Bad error, when I made some > last-minute changes, performed a DRC, but forgot to also check with > 'O'. No. An unintended short in the drawing is not a DRC violation. Testing the connectivity is not DRC. A DRC check is independent of the desired connectivity. DRC checks if the manufacturer can reliably implement the layout with the same connectivity as drawn. Flagging zero clearance of a pad as a DRC error is wrong, even if the connection is undesired. I personally prefer if the DRC check tool does pure DRC checks and not mix in connectivity checks. You may well disagree. Gruß, -- Stephan
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |