X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType:	repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder:	inbox
From:	"karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] net rules
In-reply-to:	<ee728596-cdb-3da5-2e5e-564eb7ac4bbb@grinsen-ohne-katze.de>
References:	<20221218205934 DOT F3A2F85E2912 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <ee728596-cdb-3da5-2e5e-564eb7ac4bbb AT grinsen-ohne-katze DOT de>
Comments:	In-reply-to Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
	message dated "Sun, 18 Dec 2022 23:54:25 +0100."
Mime-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<20221219014740.18DEF85E2912@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date:	Mon, 19 Dec 2022 02:47:40 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned:	ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Roland:
> On Sun, 18 Dec 2022, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> > Why is the two nets in t1 treated as the same net where
> > in t2 they are treated as separate ?
> 
> Slanted nets only connect at the endpoints.

wiki.geda-project.org/geda:gschem_ug:pins_nets_buses

says otherwise:

  Nets are made up of straight net segments, and net connections are
  formed either where two net segment ends meet, or where a net
  segment end meets a net segment midpoint.

In t2.sch I have theese two nets:

N 0 0 4000 2000 4
N 2000 1000 2000 2000 4

and the second N meets the firsts midpoint.

///

It just sounds like an undocumented, illogical and unnecessary feature.

Just as two N's be merged to one if they can be,
a single N could easily be split in two when a new
connection is made ?

I suggest that nets are only made via the net endpoints.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

- Raw text -