X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=rahul.net; s=202010;
	t=1637015498; bh=MsnIz8iztylIhSFIJqSfdm2E8OQkk+W7gZwF+BQccnc=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:Reply-To:From:From;
	b=EUX0HNozN6DyL0xOddqr60kehr8ojBWEFduRBghgiKCXozmVL8Oh2mLNpFw0K6mAi
	pU49inCR8CV42tQ2OwLfBWzYRZQOd61K1GOd9O8ckNgb1Tif4yva1oFR+q2rxasc1i
	2KIqJyo9jKhKmQ1ME2VUsAEBaL9XGc75jQdRpNkLjxBJrAvpuKqU3pQ1hbv8A5bf96
	HYi2X7jHhM5agvUsMEwTHfHiUOQYR9c/f/15I5rJUC1LnKtIQqtRM5ce6ilaAuHxoH
	aQxlZ9Utb+i6PlVHICwjh6D3tMwRnOLFi5lKdDxFIlqT8YTX703VOcpZsVRQb5M1Y2
	pyAQ24e45B3TA==
Message-ID:	<20211115223137.6977.qmail@rahul.net>
Date:	Mon, 15 Nov 2021 14:31:37 -0800
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	[geda-user] lepton-netlist spice hierarchy
X-Mailer:	VM 7.19 under Emacs 26.1
From:	"conover AT rahul DOT net (John Conover) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Spamd-Result:	default: False [-3.10 / 10.00];
	ARC_NA(0.00)[];
	HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[conover AT rahul DOT net];
	REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[];
	TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
	MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
	TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
	RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
	FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[];
	NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000];
	RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
	FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
	MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:67.160.0.0/11, country:US];
	MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
	BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id:	504FBBB8AD
X-Rspamd-Server:	aqua-new.rahul.net
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

lepton-netlist -g spice-sdb does not handle hierarchy like gnetlist.

Unless I am wrong, lepton-netlist -g spice-sdb completely ignores any
'X' pages in the schematic.

Any help would be appreciated.

    Thanks,

    John

-- 

John Conover, conover AT rahul DOT net, http://www.johncon.com/

- Raw text -