X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=rahul.net; s=202010;
	t=1636666529; bh=X0WSaiQuQfaIo+j1OqS6URbRhwY2xR4tqgkUmKM9mek=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To:From:From;
	b=f5cwZyOBl5ksZppPhZCQA978wPCmWJ7PL2YLZ4+6X1jtKFn9VfzAKIXqe5Q8QfMFJ
	XlVgl75folMU07G1oI7AaU49PGjfUzrUNFxOjdz509J84xJb9VPsBjDlW71splngCE
	ZpU2+lANYxaYnSSye2d97jn/8NSf7Nz6rspGLhbiNgZn4EvFRb/COg5UY/39R2dnlQ
	OWhaJVFr06hCDuw9evV4xX529INlASuf3A/FxyUKHxIMbEdx6Be98PU7Z9e0L4IwZI
	KhJbgFsoxcg75EeaXJmeMXcgDQbYiSv29fXUfpEWmc2IXxTYV5RllcEy6SztRj5v4F
	zkQxdC32Pd8dA==
Message-ID:	<20211111213528.31921.qmail@rahul.net>
Date:	Thu, 11 Nov 2021 13:35:28 -0800
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Removing solder mask from pads?
In-Reply-To:	<46723ae1-9651-cb1a-99c3-2c859eebeb5e@gmx.de>
References:	<20211110060918 DOT 23412 DOT qmail AT rahul DOT net>
	<46723ae1-9651-cb1a-99c3-2c859eebeb5e AT gmx DOT de>
X-Mailer:	VM 7.19 under Emacs 26.1
From:	"conover AT rahul DOT net (John Conover) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Spamd-Result:	default: False [-2.08 / 10.00];
	ARC_NA(0.00)[];
	HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[conover AT rahul DOT net];
	REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[];
	TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
	MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
	TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
	RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
	FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[];
	NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000];
	RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
	FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
	MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
	SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:67.160.0.0/11, country:US];
	MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
	BAYES_HAM(-2.98)[99.90%]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id:	6AAF2BBCC6
X-Rspamd-Server:	aqua-new.rahul.net
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Thanks!

   Works like a charm.

   John

FF 246 (ff246 AT gmx DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] writes:
> Am 10.11.21 um 07:09 schrieb conover AT rahul DOT net (John Conover) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]:
> >
> > How do you remove the solder mask from the footprint of the following
> > two layer SMA edge connector?
> >
> >      Element["" "" "" "" 423.04mil 281.42mil 0 0 0 100 ""]
> >      (
> >          Pad[-152.52mil 80.71mil -152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "1" "1" "onsolder,square"]
> >          Pad[0.00mil 80.71mil 0.00mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "2" "2" "onsolder,square"]
> >          Pad[152.52mil 80.71mil 152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "3" "3" "onsolder,square"]
> >          Pad[-152.52mil 80.71mil -152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "1" "1" "square"]
> >          Pad[0.00mil 80.71mil 0.00mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "2" "2" "square"]
> >          Pad[152.52mil 80.71mil 152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 3 "3" "3" "square"]
> >      )
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >      John
> >
> >
> 
> The following should resolve the issue:
> 
>      Element["" "" "" "" 423.04mil 281.42mil 0 0 0 100 ""]
>      (
>          Pad[-152.52mil 80.71mil -152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "1" "1" "onsolder,square"]
>          Pad[0.00mil 80.71mil 0.00mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "2" "2" "onsolder,square"]
>          Pad[152.52mil 80.71mil 152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "3" "3" "onsolder,square"]
>          Pad[-152.52mil 80.71mil -152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "1" "1" "square"]
>          Pad[0.00mil 80.71mil 0.00mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "2" "2" "square"]
>          Pad[152.52mil 80.71mil 152.52mil -80.71mil 120.00mil 20 130mil "3" "3" "square"]
>      )
> 
> 
> The seventh value inside of Pad[  ] is defining the shorter side of a rectangle around the pad, which has no solder mask inside. In your case it was 3. Without a unit, 3 would result in 0.03mil, so pretty small. You could change the value to something like 130mil and the pad will be free of solder mask (for reference: the pad width is 120mil). You should also probably change the clearance around the pad, it's currently 20 so 0.2mil, however you'd only need to do this if you have a copper filled area on one of either the top or bottom layer (only used for that). However the clearance value is not the sidelength of a rectangle, it's the space on each side combined.
> 
> If you need more information on what each value does, feel free to ask.
> 
> I hope this helped.

-- 

John Conover, conover AT rahul DOT net, http://www.johncon.com/

- Raw text -