X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=rahul.net; s=202010;
	t=1636648749; bh=mPUYAEOQ3We9ZJNA7IHaE1r2ljuWfYUJMRe+o5k3lOE=;
	h=Date:To:Subject:Reply-To:From:From;
	b=hn2jWQkCyjdkM6dPVKEtc7htYyVdb2yGlzmOOXocM2c5csXIFx8GgIwjDILAaUcQO
	i441JngCLaUO2I/urQVDSw5vUdt7SAmYkXUwe8k3NqlfzNCWVw8Tjxta/kpNv4kcw6
	dqTAIDcjSQ/+vFiiMbGSdjohHUAGq+muBYmm0JGA/lJFDFU/6C6rPVTSDx6BHgRqUh
	cwL3Ck2q6rh6AYtG/W3/jTALowuPsaeXSQ5CqB6V6kmnv6rgrDPWBJEh1XUZ5M+3J+
	qU4IweP2kuW4PgGvjENcVBPKyVKt1abreRuWuSB84EWzkZr6Oq3LPHJdqFvzAqVg7g
	LvAxGJQQK+Rjw==
Message-ID:	<20211111163908.16668.qmail@rahul.net>
Date:	Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:39:08 -0800
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	[geda-user] pcb-rnd vs pcb?
X-Mailer:	VM 7.19 under Emacs 26.1
From:	"conover AT rahul DOT net (John Conover) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Spamd-Result:	default: False [-2.10 / 10.00];
	ARC_NA(0.00)[];
	HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[conover AT rahul DOT net];
	REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[];
	TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
	MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
	TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
	RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
	FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[];
	NEURAL_HAM(-0.00)[-1.000];
	RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0];
	FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
	MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
	SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[];
	ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:67.160.0.0/11, country:US];
	MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
	BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id:	82D2EBB934
X-Rspamd-Server:	aqua-new.rahul.net
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Is there a way to use the auto router from pcb in pcb-rnd?

pcb-rnd's auto router seems inferior to pcb's.

I tried routing 44 legacy designs done with pcb, (with pcb-rnd,) and
none routed to completion.

    Thanks,

    John
    
-- 

John Conover, conover AT rahul DOT net, http://www.johncon.com/

- Raw text -