X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.7+dev
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType:	repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder:	inbox
From:	"karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] lepton-schematic configuration
In-reply-to:	<YH4DHdqSfzbxpFuc@lepton>
References:	<f8c52456-df0a-0d5e-968a-f46aecdea612 AT wavecable DOT com> <YGKiL+QJHhcTyttA AT lepton> <17a2b20c-5100-7084-b3e5-da83b4c7cc31 AT wavecable DOT com> <20210416171019 DOT AB0F783D2748 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <45fc224d-86ac-d9e7-e0c0-045f88ff3c39 AT wavecable DOT com> <YHqB1sLeFXFjw2CW AT lepton> <20210417120802 DOT AC8E5824EA9F AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <YHrhqCfn5pnbjHmp AT lepton> <20210417150846 DOT D71A7824EAA0 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <YH4DHdqSfzbxpFuc AT lepton>
Comments:	In-reply-to "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
	message dated "Tue, 20 Apr 2021 01:24:29 +0300."
Mime-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<20210420004030.ADA0580770A5@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date:	Tue, 20 Apr 2021 02:40:30 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned:	ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Vladimir:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 05:08:46PM +0200, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
...
> > > It's a shame that geda moved other way around having all means
> > > and whose interpreter just _reads_ sexps natively.)
...
> > Wasn't that about not risking evildoing commands in files inported
> > from elsewhere.
...
> > If we had that, the rationale for the ini files wouldn't hold any
> > more.
...
> Do you mean something like this?
> 
>   https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Sandboxed-Evaluation.html

Yes, perhaps.

> Well, there are simpler ways.  For example, we could just use a
> declarative style of config in Scheme instead of executable
> rc commands like Guix does.

Well, if that work, why not, would probably solve the problem you have
had with ini-files.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

- Raw text -