X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<20201223194344.9636.qmail@stuge.se>
Date:	Wed, 23 Dec 2020 19:43:44 +0000
From:	"Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gschem segfault
References:	<20201222022216 DOT B95ED8329F78 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012221619410 DOT 1197 AT nimbus>
	<20201222163534 DOT D8CAD8329F89 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<20201223151722 DOT 58648abc AT swips DOT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20201223151722.58648abc@swips.iqo.uni-hannover.de>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Hmm. I habitually have two versions of gschem on my machines: A bleeding
> edge one I compiled from git. And whatever version Debian distributes in
> their testing repo. I don't remember to have felt any interference, let
> alone segfaults caused by this set-up.

It's concievable that two builds of different versions with the same
prefix but only one actually installed could have problems, another
possibility is that some dependency libraries changed which are API
compatible but not ABI compatible.


//Peter

- Raw text -