X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=neurotica.com; s=mail;
	t=1608409997; bh=EdHXYSr6hjcTRLOr1ZZ7XjDUrOiPb8FiYI/r8dnyUdM=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=pQgA8+IkuoBskm54x9P0Afl7Ye6oQiV1und1A3L5tHvooigCYlWiHAiYp91IeuNO/
	uVuvLYWR4o5G/7oHrhddFJyZJ+HkNXZNIWz1J7n7LHOT/Eu1BBBJ+HIbqkiJ5K3M6Q
	+qOt075k0PG2kXjkkfZox28ZHIAqOM14MCHtprnl+M2wGxFgxY47HCeqDIKDLAfMOc
	MAHuq49ty2G8hcEEVEE39Lx3tcsTFYo7LBb/AYSSLa75+b9w6oCrYQUVF2KrRmBSEz
	rFQnBCFs0N8i1VE1gZtQmIr9wxqIIWV895jWUgwG4z79K13NxB38snx4GIw3JjGIeO
	JGKqQ3jsOFwOw==
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Problem with Guile 2.2.4 dependency for gEDA 1.10.1.
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<f5ab1b6f-dbf3-4be3-a43f-eb74b32b7a51 AT fastmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012190043450 DOT 7556 AT nimbus>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012191400380 DOT 24569 AT nimbus>
	<20201219180603 DOT 22277 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
From:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<99dfbc70-6f60-ea94-09bf-e698409f32ab@neurotica.com>
Date:	Sat, 19 Dec 2020 15:33:16 -0500
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20201219180603.22277.qmail@stuge.se>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 12/19/20 1:06 PM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> I increased the minimum required version numbers to those included in
>> Debian 10 (soon to be oldstable) because that's the oldest distribution
>> I test with.
> 
> Please never *ever* do that.
> 
> You need to encode the *actual* minimum required dependencies in
> configure.ac, not what your particular testing environment uses.
> 
> Forcing unneccessary upgrades is absolutely not okay.

   Agreed 100%.  I'm running on a not-very-old Mint install (19.3), and 
I need this computer to keep working because it's one of the tools that 
I use to make a living.  I can't just arbitrarily upgrade this package 
or that library for BS requirements, because that can break things, 
which is something that I absolutely cannot afford.

   I've been an under-the-hood UNIX guy for the better part of forty 
years, and I can fix things if they break, but something like this can 
cost me time that I cannot afford.

>> If gEDA/gaf 1.10.0 worked with your system, though, I'm not aware of
>> anything that would change this with gEDA/gaf 1.10.1.
> 
> Then please revert any bumped version requirements. I'd suggest
> releasing 1.10.2 after that.

   Yes, please.

           -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -