X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
	:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:to
	:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
	fm1; bh=HFAX8Ent9Ag1DvS8PHcJ1ysixbQLaCN0K16budKyYPI=; b=p/zc0v7j
	foW0q6YsUB8IL5FKA0kgX5o4cqsm2qHkFFID0026LNVOBUUanlmj8+aLfJK+nHrA
	nMdCkP+of8N4hGCZXqqC1of4lAz5h9mOe6BLm9j6uk91HsZXWhoF57XPIJOFYlwF
	DgbGWTRHhex2kJLA0+fKBz8ysWuhcqvIZDbY78+sIeliVHmiLGiCmsKvdbwaSnI2
	1vI/XpeEnZ3tQBCB6Xp2Y2+J4GzcGDqkEgsUndHVPiGRFDg2TedYIy12PzP8hGlo
	sTZSgaBE6aWf6E2VWqlLHYgQHEPqazdd7GEpfESZj57s+9D2Gc5v08CUVXkV54cN
	SB0MF4R10srGaw==
X-ME-Sender:	<xms:nVXeX6L_8EPY-Ce0ytpv4UhyrRRaAXwsJzFsyfj3f-O3JAd1u7kv6w>
	<xme:nVXeXyKAluDfGw28dlznsDiVQLSfE758HQzQ1ldBB1pcIaoYKxoJgu7mT9W7F4VSV
	8VnEovDSnMp57HcRg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause:	gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudelkedguddvlecutefuodetggdotefrod
	ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh
	necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheprhfuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgesrg
	dtreertdefjeenucfhrhhomhepifhirhhvihhnucfjvghrrhcuoehghhgvrhhrlhesfhgr
	shhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelfedukefhtdeujeevgeektd
	etgffhveeiieehveekkefggfehledtueevgfffgfenucffohhmrghinhepghgvuggrqdhp
	rhhojhgvtghtrdhorhhgnecukfhppedutdekrddvudehrdduleehrddvtdehnecuvehluh
	hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhhvghrrhhlsehf
	rghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy:	<xmx:nVXeX6ty62nYnUtW5xJZvqSHK4koCpm5oGnd_OGNJqJnOUQD099MeA>
	<xmx:nVXeX_bgzObHMqJWPjPNYJJZqkbe_UD1g8_CT4Y6Twwu1HKk6inedg>
	<xmx:nVXeXxaRZEoMji4Xow-xxAvo086AwWOiM7R0eAmD_opUZMjIz-aq5Q>
	<xmx:nlXeX6n8kI1UlY8tIF-WDYYMLN0OiY7Z0qzDlV4yQDF9tJscvPsHgA>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Problem with Guile 2.2.4 dependency for gEDA 1.10.1.
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<f5ab1b6f-dbf3-4be3-a43f-eb74b32b7a51 AT fastmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012190043450 DOT 7556 AT nimbus>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012191400380 DOT 24569 AT nimbus>
From:	"Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<7cd2efb5-177d-05b9-ecd7-433750537790@fastmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 19 Dec 2020 11:31:41 -0800
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.21.2012191400380.24569@nimbus>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------8A68152E19488560412FBA0B
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


On 12/19/20 5:07 AM, Roland Lutz wrote:
> Here's the patch to run gEDA/gaf 1.10.1 with Guile 2.0:
> http://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/commit/?h=u/rlutz/guile-2.0&id=1940290997c39d99d1294b9ae310495735ac0106 
>
>
> For the other libraries, older versions should work, as well; you can 
> just tweak the checks in configure.ac and/or xorn/configure.ac.  I 
> increased the minimum required version numbers to those included in 
> Debian 10 (soon to be oldstable) because that's the oldest 
> distribution I test with.  If gEDA/gaf 1.10.0 worked with your system, 
> though, I'm not aware of anything that would change this with gEDA/gaf 
> 1.10.1.
>
> Roland
>
Roland,

For the record, I have been using gEDA/gaf  gschem 1.10.0 (g1919a45) for 
some time now and it seems to build and work fine with guile 2.0.11.

I just tried to build 1.10.1 and got:

     ...

     checking for GUILE... no
     configure: error: you need Guile 2.2 (at least version 2.2.4)

So, to answer your last sentence:

    " If gEDA/gaf 1.10.0 worked with your system, though, I'm not aware
    of anything that would change this with gEDA/gaf 1.10.1."

this confirms the problem and 1.10.1 is different from 1.10.0.

Just to be sure, I verified 1.10.0 still compiled without error on my 
system. It does.

Girvin



--------------8A68152E19488560412FBA0B
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/19/20 5:07 AM, Roland Lutz wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012191400380 DOT 24569 AT nimbus">Here's the
      patch to run gEDA/gaf 1.10.1 with Guile 2.0:
      <br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/commit/?h=u/rlutz/guile-2.0&amp;id=1940290997c39d99d1294b9ae310495735ac0106">http://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/commit/?h=u/rlutz/guile-2.0&amp;id=1940290997c39d99d1294b9ae310495735ac0106</a>
      <br>
      <br>
      For the other libraries, older versions should work, as well; you
      can just tweak the checks in configure.ac and/or
      xorn/configure.ac.  I increased the minimum required version
      numbers to those included in Debian 10 (soon to be oldstable)
      because that's the oldest distribution I test with.  If gEDA/gaf
      1.10.0 worked with your system, though, I'm not aware of anything
      that would change this with gEDA/gaf 1.10.1.
      <br>
      <br>
      Roland
      <br>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    <p>Roland,</p>
    <p>For the record, I have been using gEDA/gaf  gschem 1.10.0
      (g1919a45) for some time now and it seems to build and work fine
      with guile 2.0.11.</p>
    I just tried to build 1.10.1 and got:
    <p>    ...<br>
    </p>
    <p>    checking for GUILE... no<br>
          configure: error: you need Guile 2.2 (at least version 2.2.4)<br>
    </p>
    <p>So, to answer your last sentence: <br>
    </p>
    <blockquote>
      <p>" If gEDA/gaf 1.10.0 worked with your system, though, I'm not
        aware of anything that would change this with gEDA/gaf 1.10.1."</p>
    </blockquote>
    <p>this confirms the problem and 1.10.1 is different from 1.10.0.</p>
    <p>Just to be sure, I verified 1.10.0 still compiled without error
      on my system. It does.<br>
    </p>
    Girvin
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>

--------------8A68152E19488560412FBA0B--

- Raw text -