X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-CMAE-Analysis:	v=2.4 cv=IZ9C5Uma c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=5fd11d00
	a=+cj0cO56Fp8x7EdhTra87A==:117 a=OSl5S0sdFaTv9JYOAhbd2w==:17
	a=9+rZDBEiDlHhcck0kWbJtElFXBc=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=zTNgK-yGK50A:10
	a=a1KZgU7cAAAA:8 a=Mj1Xp5F7AAAA:8 a=rFqHN3XqmZKAckh-oSUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
	a=ng0hpkU2jXKPaRTLMVYJ:22 a=OCttjWrK5_uSHO_3Hkg-:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT:	glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] SAB processing patches
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<e4ff3c96-939b-a93e-a32f-5e938b6daa63 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2011302045040 DOT 2894 AT nimbus>
	<20201130220505 DOT 0AE4282C54FD AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
	<7c75ed03-456c-b408-8b50-0448f6b3a04f AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012011606400 DOT 6785 AT nimbus>
	<1b2c64b3-6a36-c1f3-dd54-bb583c6bea17 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012021253440 DOT 1262 AT nimbus>
	<475f980e-fddd-60d1-9a02-a5bc5fb5805b AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012071333290 DOT 3907 AT nimbus>
	<e6c5135f-b127-fd55-91b2-79aa357a5a07 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012081644480 DOT 3649 AT nimbus>
	<acfe8649-67d3-300b-2e58-a9936467199b AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<25887669-D8C1-48B8-BEE7-13EEBFC4D006 AT noqsi DOT com>
From:	"Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<7caba1cb-6f7f-d3b8-d60d-88dd242310df@epilitimus.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:52:40 -0800
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
	Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.3
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<25887669-D8C1-48B8-BEE7-13EEBFC4D006@noqsi.com>
X-AntiAbuse:	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse:	Primary Hostname - a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net
X-AntiAbuse:	Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse:	Sender Address Domain - epilitimus.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via:	a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Authenticated-Sender:	a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4xfPgIcYEDU/Xuya4fE5O316ihbjuWwk18T1Yp9omkLnKBvQi1zajS+inIlKkmx2M96SmuaL0Op0PN9O0tmDqeePYlw9dVeK20rPZd0DrVMSrWIO2iRFVg
	OBQ3DUFT4393WysC2qqTJujJtUI/Rw1r/Yl5O9+BA5Nca3h5ntJcCISUvaAP//J12Dt8IjC4mfAJ0G71tW4dt74lMrIuOTKBWUST+kG1yx32r/SKkD0hU7Rs
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

John Doty wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 9, 2020, at 12:42 AM, Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
>> <mailto:glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com>) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com
>> <mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com>] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com
>> <mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com>> wrote:
>>
>>> So the gnetlist backend to generate the xspice netlist needs the
>>> bridge devices in the schematic (the sim context)
>
> Not true. With gnet-spice-noqsi, you may put the bridge devices either
> in a subcircuit that’s referenced by the spice-prototype attribute, or
> directly in the spice-prototype attribute.
>
>>> but other non
>>> simulation netlists (the ab context), e.g. pcd or partslist, need them
>>> removed. At the risk of starting another discusson, this is why the
>>> spice-noqsi backend was not going to work, it works in the sim
>>> context.
>
> The stuff in a spice-prototype attribute is ignored by every other
> netlister. That’s how you can keep the sims domain separate from from
> other domains.
>
The whole point here is that the bridge devices and other simulation
components show up when processing the schematic for a parts list or
some other non simulation context.

Glenn

- Raw text -