X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:47:10 +0100 (CET)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	"karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] automatically create a .sch file containing a single
	component?
In-Reply-To:	<20201209073734.B29CC8512092@turkos.aspodata.se>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.21.2012091433380.1205@nimbus>
References:	<CAC4O8c_Gssuua3aHJSEMTW_Sw5W9rvtwrys1e=BP=CvHmEifJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2012071323330 DOT 3438 AT nimbus> <20201209073734 DOT B29CC8512092 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, karl AT aspodata DOT se [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Regarding:
> <box x="0" y="0" width="170" height="110" color="lock" width="0"/>
>
> why not <box pos="0,0" size="170,110" ...>

The former is easier to work with for XML tools (retrieving an attribute 
is typically simpler than string manipulation to split the combined 
coordinates).

> (and why do you have two "witdh"s in the example ?)

That's an oversight; the second one should be "linewidth".

> Or why not
> B 0,0 17000,11000 15 0 0  0,-1,-1,0  -1,-1,-1,-1,-1
> which would keep related things together and be visually easier to read.
> Or have named arguments for the lesser used args., like
> B 0,0 17000,11000 15 0 0  dash=0,-1,-1,0  fill=-1,-1,-1,-1,-1
> which could then be simplified to
> B 0,0 17000,11000 15 0 0
> which is a more reasonable size for an argument list.

These seem like a good compromise between human and tool parsability. 
However, I'd prefer not to change the file format as long as I can get 
away with it.

Roland

- Raw text -