X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=FIP65zWOpaHJwRBG3LbyXWsoyFGS6swPpeV+SF3CJPM=;
	b=isf6hw1J6MXtm5emiynO/utqwBDOo7N8Hmj+DC/BCNc//YiPhThkqarmMLMnUdu+6f
	91zQLzlqAS8cmFe16JUhbPaYt2kAOYtrDquGLje17HWagpgV3S9zM/cduGpOYg2YarU0
	cqS4/pKf8KdxdmnemGKkpCAMNER7FrxYjMBuMSePkoS/4LSdj6lU+Yr+//bhX118sB4G
	h2Ci6HCNEkax5zXEiYDTYmNQEQxB1qm4mV9AqNTl5MAnruEBGEJqtrkmmc7jmdjmGSwA
	j2/VZNI7qheeBw3cuFyeJEHHymhEuFA6TbBMms/tgpK6Cyhjdy8rmAlvKBO4bSf9zPIJ
	junA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=FIP65zWOpaHJwRBG3LbyXWsoyFGS6swPpeV+SF3CJPM=;
	b=BVDZnhSD2gJAx9EJp2TBnIvbAhNQzv6aj8EA81KaRXmt3Uw4Z9y+MoIeegRqbhsGNc
	T1BDL2oXFt9lybfXFdhmTtPB5dcf1hU+w8DkkYTOQSUInn01DbpDaM797Y0lN/G8Gt16
	+HI7VOOt6oHQ08IOHcMxPNn08FgmUHmIeLBFkLvRX6Y3kqPJrH6SlQEA31X2kBO0LWsi
	WnZ3KnpW1kiffX84kxX9/Wn6AzRL6Sk2xyxsnwxTbDefGs2vDKb5QBLrJsjiByluseHQ
	9XKJH3nBFyAzTqwKU6Q3yjLxs4HqfB4QpY9c3ylFV0Ngt3Dkf+OU8UiKbm8ELw0Z1h2I
	BPjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOAM533r5d5Yer423D3TH0wgK9qkUJReliXfE8aDHdZew7vWgi5uAjhd
	3my3ed7G72kyJq/eK+X/JeOnhznvFdTBilpwVj915qjF6b0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ABdhPJziiulk5xOJBzzdwAQ3G1W0pLRGSr4GyNXjMhr8aumGXGVckrduGWnrO2VePWZPF6z7Zzsz1KIZc9hzF+S2yes=
X-Received:	by 2002:a25:4f83:: with SMTP id d125mr1299744ybb.388.1607026373008;
	Thu, 03 Dec 2020 12:12:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 3 Dec 2020 11:12:41 -0900
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c_Gssuua3aHJSEMTW_Sw5W9rvtwrys1e=BP=CvHmEifJA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	[geda-user] automatically create a .sch file containing a single component?
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Another small thing I'd like to automate is my setup for validating
footprints of symbols.  I use heavy symbols with footprints associated
with each part.  To check a symbol I first create a .sym and .fpt,
then create a file checkfpt.sch which contains just the .sym, then use
gsh2pcb to create a pcb file containing the symbol, and launch pcb to
take a look at it.

The part that's pointlessly interactive is the creation of the .sch
file.  I have to have gschem launched and manually add the symbol.

I'd like to do one of these instead:

* create an sch containing just the sch using some batch mode op

* just create the sch by script.  but I don't get why some text
elements (refdes=, device=) end up
  repeated in the .sch file and other stay in the element.  what
distinguishes these elements?

* create the pcb file directly.  sort of a hassle but probably what
I'll do unless there's a better way,
  a little weird in my case since I have a lot of footprints using a
text library of my own

* view the footprint file in a way that shows the refdes.  I know it
possible to view footprints directly
  with pcb, the only problem with this is it doesn't show the refdes.
Is there some way to make it
  do so?

Britton

- Raw text -