X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=optonline.net;
	s=dkim-001; t=1603674550;
	bh=t7Ue6ISVjbQHkH81zbxtCXKlN54N4Mm8OepdmEbayss=;
	h=From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To;
	b=Tk90mvL3z6kR9SU9vrMoeVU50GbesNpRhhpYsCeWUMnLWusPU7C56RRPxwH30SQ6R
	mTKe1IH5xcrPnvF6wTPx1ycOd2KZw2JSMbJ7W+bk6G39G6krNc0fbtk5f9fAG7MYwl
	6FfZOfghGpHms4vgneb7jDragsxFSYmOj2QB1xxJcEi/YxrPuYYZn8+hNNLslmB/45
	QqREWk+Kwyh1nNfXtNAvbu+FaeU3MPJjixDP1JClCkSKtD98MfX/kYXFfEaMkZishl
	7pwRLnQ4nKwv9KiomxMPT7W08XNFCGDzS4Wj3BIFm+nY+D/j7zoNs3AEgPsYevmo4V
	dK+6xMR1PDg3A==
Authentication-Results:	mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net smtp.user=geneglick; auth=pass (LOGIN)
Authentication-Results:	mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net x-tls.subject="/C=US/ST=California/L=Mountain View/O=Google LLC/CN=smtp.gmail.com"; auth=pass (cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256)
X-Content-Analysis:	v=2.3 cv=OIq8IRSB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=J/7jlSkcs1LoivLX4GcEXw==:117 a=afefHYAZSVUA:10 a=J0nTKcvaUPHRqPFlLKoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=SsjqTccgJcTgEus-D5sA:9 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=xoEH_sTeL_Rfw54TyV31:22
X-Gm-Message-State:	AOAM532Vgmxz9T5rsD37g8y0G1FusQxV3URGkb1jTzYcU3UBEtGVKFOe
	Z8u0Eg2btl0TWTGGhcJgfhJO4zjznvU393fIdzs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	ABdhPJwqIt4htNnHnTc/lVfmfxRD59gwTIJaxdVT84S3hodml04APjGu/KiUZ9e+plA1FFHNqArq7pm1FAVzBAEe/Qw=
X-Received:	by 2002:a25:bc09:: with SMTP id i9mr20803901ybh.237.1603674544458;
	Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<5ba24d79-87b2-c783-2bb9-a562d8dc4d73 AT linetec DOT nl> <xnh7qhkh8k DOT fsf AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<xnh7qhkh8k.fsf@envy.delorie.com>
From:	"gene glick (geneglick AT optonline DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sun, 25 Oct 2020 21:08:54 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID:	<CAGBFkM0CE9udTcd2Lr7sbDLdZf0SytOW5+pfH8_uTpMZs9kg8w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Message-ID:	<CAGBFkM0CE9udTcd2Lr7sbDLdZf0SytOW5+pfH8_uTpMZs9kg8w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] PCB, 2 parts physically in the same place
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

--0000000000008ed0b905b28893ea
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Richard, you understand correctly. I too made a shape for the display, all
the mount holes and the 10-pin holes on 0.1" centers. I was trying to add
the 10-pin header in as well.

DJ, I tried that but it does not work when both components are placed.. The
best I've come up with so far is to first place the display without the
overlapping 10-pin header. Then make the thermals, top and bottom. Next,
place the 10-pin header. Now the thermals nearly but not completely
disappear. So I think the clearance dimension on the 10-pin is erasing the
thermals. If I press ctl-k (?) to decrease the clearance, then the thermals
reappear! Good news. DRC still complains about overlap violations however.

--0000000000008ed0b905b28893ea
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Richard, you understand correctly. I=
 too made a shape for the display, all the mount holes and the 10-pin holes=
 on 0.1&quot; centers. I was trying to add the 10-pin header in as well.</d=
iv><div><br></div><div>DJ, I tried that but it does not work when both comp=
onents are placed.. The best I&#39;ve come up with so far is to first place=
 the display without the overlapping 10-pin header. Then make the thermals,=
 top and bottom. Next, place the 10-pin header. Now the thermals nearly but=
 not completely disappear. So I think the clearance dimension on the 10-pin=
 is erasing the thermals. If I press ctl-k (?) to decrease the clearance, t=
hen the thermals reappear! Good news. DRC still complains about overlap vio=
lations however.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br></div>

--0000000000008ed0b905b28893ea--

- Raw text -