X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-CMAE-Analysis:	v=2.3 cv=dpil9Go4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0
	a=+cj0cO56Fp8x7EdhTra87A==:117 a=lurIF75RORk3CC+Wg1aYyQ==:17
	a=9+rZDBEiDlHhcck0kWbJtElFXBc=:19 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19
	a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=afefHYAZSVUA:10 a=rEs-uQuVAAAA:20 a=ZNzOqGV4AAAA:8
	a=1t_nUuTBDw24PH-Yx58A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=E-7ZDB97qVM_U7m9UvkO:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT:	glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=epilitimus.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:
	In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:
	Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:
	Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:
	List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=5agqEChZgAdN9WXiTl8w9aMlonanRy+Rlz2wb7XtCbc=; b=Wnjpv43vr3lahY6eC9G8aH3V8i
	WqCC3yYPJxMRxrapZguQyhtm3ovWP8/KLbZ/7tKh6WfoxqJG3FZp/F2NLQKB3pp+yWZfaAUuJH8l5
	1rwkLle7+HDco9EV6cYNSP03p4mEztx7z26krMHT9cbPMDPQXdx5ra3J6alZ6GmBEuV7q74vXOpu6
	+GbNNfmjYyQd0HJUIkph/R1imQjsaolW99BMc1HwxOY1kf+Lcyw5h0MAdvKB9mbIOQ1xAVqGQTrS4
	/HfKIGAoEy8BbBL3yPTIb1RhcvqN6f8LlnnLuwUZhaYh+S419e4tYZaLryvYuYQGrbwB5FtorqO0d
	0M/HqbdA==;
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] submitted a new patch
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<14f9e862-8ee0-4432-23b6-06e94215baa4 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2010120958150 DOT 2535 AT nimbus>
	<32bfe083-3604-b747-030a-48a13e2b1074 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2010122312420 DOT 8245 AT nimbus>
	<7c133ba2-5b09-91f3-808f-9f444c625278 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2010151343310 DOT 1527 AT nimbus>
	<aa7c0456-a606-be86-58c4-b8352cc66127 AT epilitimus DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 21 DOT 2010231526280 DOT 12318 AT nimbus>
	<A61C3EBE-CBAA-4951-874D-F215EB5515CA AT noqsi DOT com>
From:	"Glenn (glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<de6de2cd-a4e4-b66f-87b7-8256dee1184f@epilitimus.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:07:27 -0800
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
	Firefox/60.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.3
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<A61C3EBE-CBAA-4951-874D-F215EB5515CA@noqsi.com>
X-AntiAbuse:	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse:	Primary Hostname - a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net
X-AntiAbuse:	Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse:	Sender Address Domain - epilitimus.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via:	a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Authenticated-Sender:	a2plcpnl0121.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: glimrick AT epilitimus DOT com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-CMAE-Envelope:	MS4wfEnfADWQfseFtF2/P4s1rtcdZL5cdeWgTqKFipx9/683JHjvO+5fBtIYpSJMwpWvHnGpLQztEecukSbn46YpbB9Y0b2ZcAwrM+P5jdkO/TUujFL5gXFi
	XWsleKixAvLne/ejzh3jAb6aFO73sa7AHMjuCgnCuR+Nh4lJkPPC5DhxG7zIobJEySbOtMHyqrh9awQ85PymteM+5zh2vXNHeco=
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

From https://github.com/noqsi/gnet-spice-noqsi/blob/master/README.md
"The version for /gEDA/ and |gnetlist| is frozen. It is tagged here
<https://github.com/noqsi/gnet-spice-noqsi/tree/geda-gaf> as
/geda-gaf-release-2/."

When opening Test.sch from your BBAmp tutorial:
> The following options are present in your configuration:
>
>   traverse-hierarchy (in
> /home/glenn/temp/gnet-spice-noqsi-geda-gaf-release-2/tutorial/BBamp/Simulation/geda.conf)
>
> These options were introduced in gEDA/gaf 1.9.1 as a replacement for
> the corresponding gnetlistrc options but were removed again in
> gEDA/gaf 1.10.0. The current version of gnetlist uses gnetlistrc
> options instead:
>
>   (hierarchy-traversal "disabled")
>
> Please make sure to update your configuration as the options currently
> set won't have the desired effect.

Glenn

John Doty wrote:
>>
>> Any opinions from people who use SPICE?
>
> From the ngspice manual:
>
> "you may place a .TITLE <any title> line anywhere in your input deck.
> The first line of your input deck will be overridden by the contents
> of this line following the .TITLE statement.”
>
> This means that no special feature is required of a SPICE netlister
> here: all the gEDA SPICE netlisters have ways to insert arbitrary
> SPICE directives into the deck. I’m not a fan of adding special
> features that duplicate general capabilities.
>
>> What bothers me is the usage of the "comment=" attribute:
>
> I think that attributes specialized to a particular netlist format
> should use names unique to the format going forward. For spice-noqsi,
> there are spice-prolog=, spice-epilog= and spice-prototype=. Legacy
> attributes like file= are, of course, difficult to replace.
>
> John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
>
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com <mailto:jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
>
>
>
>

- Raw text -