delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Sun, 30 Aug 2020 21:24:57 +0200 (CEST) |
From: | Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> |
To: | "N (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gschem versatility, variants in sub folder |
In-Reply-To: | <20200830203838.3bafa159a451192936d6e271@gmail.com> |
Message-ID: | <alpine.DEB.2.21.2008302123420.3137@nimbus> |
References: | <20200830203838 DOT 3bafa159a451192936d6e271 AT gmail DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020, N (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > While a little bit primitive gschem is without doubt versatile. Needed > different variations of schematic where they are the same at top level > but different further down, by making link in sub folder together with > with different variations I where able to achieve this. You can find an explanation of hierarchical schematics here: http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:hierarchy What exactly are you trying to achieve?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |