delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2020/01/26/17:33:28

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h=
reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-type; s=fm2; bh=BMQpOjpa38xZdwTeOU8sFwDFo3k
uOObWne0cAi1/7+E=; b=WrqRhPUTlvcMwSlXhjxvYGV2c912qeNWLCmFmgI5+5M
Au6d9CkvipGO7PqGVc/rMExfFOTEjBGgMO4qwaEh6rGIqSH9eBD9liVBlAAmBZPq
R13QTHwg7v0FHqsdExAoFecvW3wuYOJilpzkSggfWIzW6gPeuG+9G369b3gawFYS
WgF7zsF4h9sznZptk8E0EA19LEb0QMz+rp89Rh1L//+P8Z3lDfia8isozO8RPx8k
Ugf7F6hv9F1lENChveXRHCkDRZo/nhSi6FEXbIvPFZ/l9d/WGf9aNvoL+9RxBrlf
oFZ+DfGGEGPcyX1CtdbqYgwRw/UoEEk/QosmIAL0bOQ==
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:to
:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
fm1; bh=BMQpOjpa38xZdwTeOU8sFwDFo3kuOObWne0cAi1/7+E=; b=jC7LWIdt
dmpNe75yJ+MEalyGtTpL6VduIR/4jSZBKsjRl/tgU3cwlj83daw5pvCEmcx5EVxS
Cv2/9MnSpRF4ADoMG1i1Fbi98GFjWVKoK+2zpqYyHMzSXYotMcOpRCNngt3/kReW
3wxLi3eHRah0koKMV6VVlgShxTAxObPm7PKVOtvLvg8IQpqlryjlp0PlVdkn+T65
UO3Qw/Hgy3TPRTMUvHsjpfnUiKGsaQa7Q4NZWxwpS4WB7Yofytw1OTWxnuzysXkr
qitrXSqi9RSOBh4ahyRs8VJnOHewyXg/MJwamWGOHNAVP4kXSRHwN80AgmPTWP+B
X2ni++FlBWECVg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:iA4uXobiIRpi-co0Z8LYlDk6Pwt9AGSvVZ9verMi9LEbwJvfIlRUXw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrfedtgdduiedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpehruffvfhfhkffffgggjggtsegrtd
erredtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefiihhrvhhinhcujfgvrhhruceoghhhvghrrhhlsehfrghs
thhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecukfhppedutdekrddvudehrdduleehrddvtdehnecuvehluh
hsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhhvghrrhhlsehf
rghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:iA4uXp0S-95ksYnUnenElbAdRqW0VllHcBv_6IukhDoGq-Uf4uqdoQ>
<xmx:iA4uXrwN9rx9qf3hEyUfW8N2wFWxf296jfG8yQvp5yzM4sqgpNQ4Hg>
<xmx:iA4uXlim1jolzKaSVCuMPomCqcsr8Wwx0ifeVLtIJHCem_1UgolsFQ>
<xmx:iQ4uXkspUyKF92jeW3ZVO90_MHKOtcjQz5cw_LzevKLfp7dS1BSwiA>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] pcb 4.2.2 build with check fatal error
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <4f3b0985-fc53-8a75-c4d2-d895c5c1e3fc AT fastmail DOT com>
<CAJZxidDrgSjutLeq7W_obVxnHXYtijHfKizB2Px94TadK3_rgg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
From: "Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID: <7c1c0e4a-b2d8-18ba-4d8e-84d76ab068f4@fastmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 14:10:07 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJZxidDrgSjutLeq7W_obVxnHXYtijHfKizB2Px94TadK3_rgg@mail.gmail.com>
Note-from-DJ: This may be spam
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------7841D5BE89A0081B40894A04
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Chad,

I am not sure about 4.2.1. I went from 4.1.3 to 4.2.2. I have 4.2.1, I 
just skipped over it to 4.2.2. I also have 4.2.0. I can check them 
tomorrow and get back to you with the results. I just don't have the 
time today. If I happen to forget about it, "ping" me.

Girvin


On 1/26/20 10:24 AM, Chad Parker (parker DOT charles AT gmail DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Grivin-
>
> Thanks for reporting. Did 4.2.1 throw the same error? There should be 
> no functional difference between the two releases that would cause this.
>
> Thanks,
> --Chad
>
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 4:14 PM Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com 
> <mailto:gherrl AT fastmail DOT com>) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com 
> <mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com>] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com 
> <mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com>> wrote:
>
>     Greetings,
>
>     Building pcb 4.2.2 under Slackware Linux 14.2.
>
>     Just a note to inform that my first build of pcb 4.2.2 with "make
>     check"
>     caused the following test failure snippet of the build output.
>     This one
>     fatal error is not a show-stopper for me since i can still build
>     without
>     the check target, but I thought you might be interested in it.
>
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Test:  drc-clearance-misc
>     drc-clearance-misc | drctest.script drctest-clearance-misc.pcb |
>     action
>     | | | ascii:drcreport.txt diff:flags-before.txt;flags-after.txt
>     (cd outputs/drc-clearance-misc && ../../../src/pcbtest.sh
>     --action-script drctest.script drctest-clearance-misc.pcb)
>     --- ./golden/drc-clearance-misc/drcreport.txt    2020-01-04
>     10:41:13.000000000 -0800
>     +++ outputs/drc-clearance-misc/drcreport.txt    2020-01-25
>     11:44:31.000000000 -0800
>     @@ -120,4 +120,18 @@
>       explanation: Circuits that are too close may bridge during imaging,
>     etching,
>       plating, or soldering processes resulting in a direct short.
>     +location: (x, y) = (4622800, 63093600), angle = 0.000000
>     +have_measured: false
>     +measured value: 0
>     +required value: 127000
>     +object count: 2
>     +object IDs: 97 122
>     +object types: 4 16384
>     +
>     +********************************************************************************
>     +                                  Violation 9
>     +********************************************************************************
>     +title: Copper areas too close
>     +explanation: Circuits that are too close may bridge during imaging,
>     etching,
>     +plating, or soldering processes resulting in a direct short.
>       location: (x, y) = (4648200, 66548000), angle = 0.000000
>       have_measured: false
>     @@ -129,5 +143,5 @@
>
>       ********************************************************************************
>     -                                  Violation 9
>     +                                  Violation 10
>       ********************************************************************************
>       title: Copper areas too close
>     @@ -143,5 +157,5 @@
>
>       ********************************************************************************
>     -                                  Violation 10
>     +                                  Violation 11
>       ********************************************************************************
>       title: Copper areas too close
>     @@ -157,5 +171,5 @@
>
>       ********************************************************************************
>     -                                  Violation 11
>     +                                  Violation 12
>       ********************************************************************************
>       title: Potential for broken trace
>     @@ -171,5 +185,5 @@
>
>       ********************************************************************************
>     -                                  Violation 12
>     +                                  Violation 13
>       ********************************************************************************
>       title: Copper areas too close
>     @@ -185,5 +199,5 @@
>
>       ********************************************************************************
>     -                                  Violation 13
>     +                                  Violation 14
>       ********************************************************************************
>       title: Copper areas too close
>     FAIL
>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     Building without "check" was successful.
>
>     Girvin
>
>

--------------7841D5BE89A0081B40894A04
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>Chad,</p>
    <p>I am not sure about 4.2.1. I went from 4.1.3 to 4.2.2. I have
      4.2.1, I just skipped over it to 4.2.2. I also have 4.2.0. I can
      check them tomorrow and get back to you with the results. I just
      don't have the time today. If I happen to forget about it, "ping"
      me.<br>
    </p>
    <p>Girvin</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/26/20 10:24 AM, Chad Parker
      (<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:parker DOT charles AT gmail DOT com">parker DOT charles AT gmail DOT com</a>) [via <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>] wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAJZxidDrgSjutLeq7W_obVxnHXYtijHfKizB2Px94TadK3_rgg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div>Grivin-</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Thanks for reporting. Did 4.2.1 throw the same error? There
          should be no functional difference between the two releases
          that would cause this.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Thanks,</div>
        <div>--Chad<br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 4:14
          PM Girvin Herr (<a href="mailto:gherrl AT fastmail DOT com"
            moz-do-not-send="true">gherrl AT fastmail DOT com</a>) [via <a
            href="mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com" moz-do-not-send="true">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>]
          &lt;<a href="mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com"
            moz-do-not-send="true">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
          0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Greetings,<br>
          <br>
          Building pcb 4.2.2 under Slackware Linux 14.2.<br>
          <br>
          Just a note to inform that my first build of pcb 4.2.2 with
          "make check" <br>
          caused the following test failure snippet of the build output.
          This one <br>
          fatal error is not a show-stopper for me since i can still
          build without <br>
          the check target, but I thought you might be interested in it.<br>
          <br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
          Test:  drc-clearance-misc<br>
          drc-clearance-misc | drctest.script drctest-clearance-misc.pcb
          | action <br>
          | | | ascii:drcreport.txt
          diff:flags-before.txt;flags-after.txt<br>
          (cd outputs/drc-clearance-misc &amp;&amp;
          ../../../src/pcbtest.sh   <br>
          --action-script drctest.script drctest-clearance-misc.pcb)<br>
          --- ./golden/drc-clearance-misc/drcreport.txt    2020-01-04 <br>
          10:41:13.000000000 -0800<br>
          +++ outputs/drc-clearance-misc/drcreport.txt    2020-01-25 <br>
          11:44:31.000000000 -0800<br>
          @@ -120,4 +120,18 @@<br>
            explanation: Circuits that are too close may bridge during
          imaging, <br>
          etching,<br>
            plating, or soldering processes resulting in a direct short.<br>
          +location: (x, y) = (4622800, 63093600), angle = 0.000000<br>
          +have_measured: false<br>
          +measured value: 0<br>
          +required value: 127000<br>
          +object count: 2<br>
          +object IDs: 97 122<br>
          +object types: 4 16384<br>
          +<br>
+********************************************************************************<br>
          +                                  Violation 9<br>
+********************************************************************************<br>
          +title: Copper areas too close<br>
          +explanation: Circuits that are too close may bridge during
          imaging, <br>
          etching,<br>
          +plating, or soldering processes resulting in a direct short.<br>
            location: (x, y) = (4648200, 66548000), angle = 0.000000<br>
            have_measured: false<br>
          @@ -129,5 +143,5 @@<br>
          <br>
  ********************************************************************************<br>
          -                                  Violation 9<br>
          +                                  Violation 10<br>
  ********************************************************************************<br>
            title: Copper areas too close<br>
          @@ -143,5 +157,5 @@<br>
          <br>
  ********************************************************************************<br>
          -                                  Violation 10<br>
          +                                  Violation 11<br>
  ********************************************************************************<br>
            title: Copper areas too close<br>
          @@ -157,5 +171,5 @@<br>
          <br>
  ********************************************************************************<br>
          -                                  Violation 11<br>
          +                                  Violation 12<br>
  ********************************************************************************<br>
            title: Potential for broken trace<br>
          @@ -171,5 +185,5 @@<br>
          <br>
  ********************************************************************************<br>
          -                                  Violation 12<br>
          +                                  Violation 13<br>
  ********************************************************************************<br>
            title: Copper areas too close<br>
          @@ -185,5 +199,5 @@<br>
          <br>
  ********************************************************************************<br>
          -                                  Violation 13<br>
          +                                  Violation 14<br>
  ********************************************************************************<br>
            title: Copper areas too close<br>
          FAIL<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
          <br>
          Building without "check" was successful.<br>
          <br>
          Girvin<br>
          <br>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>

--------------7841D5BE89A0081B40894A04--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019