delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Virus-Scanned: | Debian amavisd-new at mail.linetec.nl |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
From: | "Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | [geda-user] Pcb: Automatic clearance between polygons? |
Message-ID: | <3721c0b4-2805-2d9f-eba0-119c9c2dd81e@linetec.nl> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:06:47 +0100 |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 |
Thunderbird/60.6.1 | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Perhaps a stupid pcb question that probably has been answered a long time ago already, but I still wondered: Is there a way to get clearance around a polygon where it overlaps with another polygon on the same layer? I want to make a dozen identical high-current connections using as much copper surface as available, and polygons are much better suited for this than thick traces. But I also want to fill remaining space with a ground-connected polygon, of course without overlapping (and thus shorting) the smaller polygons. Is there a flag to make a polygon behave like a pad/pin or trace in this respect, so that another polygon automatically maintains a clearance gap around the 'flagged' one? Or is manually carving out the circumference of the smaller polygons (e.g. using the Polygon Hole function) still the only option? Because this latter can be a bit tedious -- and it would of course be nice if there's a simple way to do this that I failed to find so far. Thanks in advance, Richard Rasker
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |