| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
| X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Date: | Fri, 29 Nov 2019 23:38:07 +0100 (CET) |
| From: | Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> |
| To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: [geda-user] undefined symbol: scm_is_exact_integer |
| In-Reply-To: | <20191129212159.7112980395B9@turkos.aspodata.se> |
| Message-ID: | <alpine.DEB.2.20.1911292327030.2587@nimbus> |
| References: | <20191129212159 DOT 7112980395B9 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> |
| User-Agent: | Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote: > So you should either not use that function, or require at least guile > v2.0.10. That's correct; I'll set the minimum requirement to Guile 2.0.10. Thank you for your feedback! I'm a bit unsure how to proceed about minimum required versions. Since I don't have an easy way to test gEDA/gaf with older dependency versions, I don't notice if something breaks unless someone tells me. One option would be requiring at least the versions shipped in Debian oldstable. This is the oldest distribution on which I regularly build gEDA/gaf, and considering the overall conservativeness of Debian, these should be reasonable minimum versions to expect. What do you think?
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |