X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X_CMAE_Category:	, ,
X-CNFS-Analysis:	v=2.3 cv=FLplONgs c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OAvc3ylXTZnwW13UMKQG5A==:117 a=OAvc3ylXTZnwW13UMKQG5A==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=jlQd9YhnVdoA:10 a=J70Eh1EUuV4A:10 a=JbhlE8a8jZIA:10 a=2G49xsVbRJXpG7HzQjgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=pHzHmUro8NiASowvMSCR:22 a=nt3jZW36AmriUCFCBwmW:22
X-CM-Score:	0
X-Scanned-by:	Cloudmark Authority Engine
X-Authed-Username:	dG9tZGVhbkB3YXZlY2FibGUuY29t
X_CMAE_Category:	, ,
X-CNFS-Analysis:
X-CM-Score:
X-Scanned-by:	Cloudmark Authority Engine
Authentication-Results:	smtp02.emerald.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=tomdean AT wavecable DOT com; spf=permerror; sender-id=permerror
Authentication-Results:	smtp02.emerald.cmh.synacor.com header.from=tomdean AT wavecable DOT com; sender-id=permerror
Authentication-Results:	smtp02.emerald.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=tomdean; auth=pass (LOGIN)
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Is gEDA no Longer Maintained
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<e9c8bd38-5517-3086-7c20-9bd92cbc331e AT wavecable DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 20 DOT 1909242312180 DOT 1856 AT nimbus>
	<20190926041402 DOT 189fc2ef AT swips DOT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 20 DOT 1909262256310 DOT 9310 AT nimbus>
From:	"Thomas D. Dean (tomdean AT wavecable DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<dd32db6a-bc67-c45a-3e4c-6ef6b168399e@wavecable.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:54:53 -0700
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.20.1909262256310.9310@nimbus>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id x8QMtejg019185
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 9/26/19 2:13 PM, Roland Lutz wrote:
> I fixed the bug reported by Thomas D. Dean and Kai-Martin Knaak as well 
> as the related issues (running gnetlist before gschem won't be an issue 
> any longer).  Long story short: I had mixed calls to the built programs 
> into the examples/gTAG Makefile, which is a bad idea and repeatedly 
> caused trouble.  Moving the regeneration of the example files to a 
> separate script solved the issue.
> 
> 

Thanks.  That fixed it.

gnetlist works.

Tom Dean

- Raw text -