delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=majenko.co.uk; s=key1; | |
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; | |
bh=do4AgI6uHqTYWANq0Y8qEPU4nL+m0m2hJfbvso3Yen4=; | |
b=Ibjwqbz1MlwVy60LAOFRlw86aK3k9PB0YSsGhRcvjefEoSHwOlLigUC81w1lcpdQe1 | |
us6jidqzycRi2xHn36E1Js9PjzYLh4vnowsN4/U20UUn/oMDhP3pt0blI9pE/s+2jhDz | |
O48yF8v4f50tES/yJhMbzrMrghuaLgIQDMntR84bAhl7IKWXNnzBh8z+GBh69+kFcGNa | |
Bm33MJA+xuGByS3yCj/j5CBa1ZPBX9WriCC13TuGpkkgQNQ+J7B58GDc3VHHdPc9q77M | |
F5tDP2ZzCvjwAQ0jb4kBvMz0pneyZBuCaG9cxuFtgB0/B0+wvzhDw7uqSsC/zqJhNOtK | |
N0CQ== | |
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=1e100.net; s=20161025; | |
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date | |
:message-id:subject:to; | |
bh=do4AgI6uHqTYWANq0Y8qEPU4nL+m0m2hJfbvso3Yen4=; | |
b=DnlGehtPFvDhb3ArUW1PBE7kf5bP8kLxQyefPvO7mEQxJ4O2hSmqiith0gMQtOlIxI | |
+Svpd2zs2DAzhHvjCYRWnkZEdB8gLSiUwNKR76ZRg3OsTCrOFVXR0YeRKzfjY6BQGYTF | |
G72laqcanJe84oD25XgY+mmGXjRsSWCVgb36LYGKqFjUcjg7MmOOf0+9LsHEr+atAGSD | |
8pGkmwExpNWCLUIyI4QWWF26AtDXKAn/kNre5Q+YGlif8aNMSTSq7kHfTrSnqcaB7VlC | |
wLgZhkl8yxw5tNA52//Yc37O8vuXjwn65Sqjf0ZdLKZg0FX5lcUijeVe2x66N6HeAc9x | |
ISHg== | |
X-Gm-Message-State: | APjAAAWseIJkvHOz8rXAiKajXkGcEa9t/ElhXNdo5KBszTWfgBhamYbD |
ErSHK0UnXcpulSWayNvw+nrI0TKx2LQ++QhGtQSqiZryedk= | |
X-Google-Smtp-Source: | APXvYqy1gWxoFx8MxhWSmGbbU4BSXAanVvulWsMjQKmZ2Bm49YLha+51s5J8clt1wTbr/d/c+EnYwADQ1Gex90z64ZA= |
X-Received: | by 2002:ac2:5bde:: with SMTP id u30mr2984238lfn.59.1569358821481; |
Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:00:21 -0700 (PDT) | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
References: | <e9c8bd38-5517-3086-7c20-9bd92cbc331e AT wavecable DOT com> |
<CAPp8_Dpm3zuzdEv=FRNiuGHoDb=XW87DRVyS7YABc0d43Z_q3w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> | |
<CAPp8_Drs=fP1=TU8zY=JH+x4G-2iy3n4+EaZ9mzpe4EiZfOt0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <87r24531yj DOT fsf AT gag DOT com> | |
In-Reply-To: | <87r24531yj.fsf@gag.com> |
From: | "Majenko Technologies (matt AT majenko DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
Date: | Tue, 24 Sep 2019 22:00:10 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <CAPp8_DrGgEm5uWWcMg4qfij6gdAeiuN8rEOkZV4NJJEdvt0-xA@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Is gEDA no Longer Maintained |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
--0000000000001471be059352d385 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Yeah, those glitches and crashes sure are a pain. If I can work out some form of IPC for controlling saving and reverting of open files I'll definitely switch over to it. On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, 21:40 Bdale Garbee, <bdale AT gag DOT com> wrote: > "Majenko Technologies (matt AT majenko DOT co DOT uk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" > <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> writes: > > > So... can anyone give me a quick overview of what's improved in lepton? > > Things I should look for and marvel at? > > For me, the big win is that released versions of gschem would just crash > from time to time, and had a number of visual "artifacts" when zooming > in/out, etc... all of which seem to be gone from the current > lepton-schematic. Put differently, to me lepton-schematic is just like > gschem but with fewer annoying bugs. > > It may be that there are better gschem bits in git, but as a > distribution package maintainer I *try* to use the released versions I > package whenever possible... so I just wouldn't know. > > The lepton-eda folk were also happy to accept my contribution of a tEDAx > output module for getting data to pcb-rnd sanely, and rolled it into a > new release fairly quickly, which I really appreciated as the primary > current maintainer of gEDA-related/derived packages in Debian. > > Bdale > --0000000000001471be059352d385 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto">Yeah, those glitches and crashes sure are a pain. If I ca= n work out some form of IPC for controlling saving and reverting of open fi= les I'll definitely switch over to it.</div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo= te"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, 21:40 Bdale = Garbee, <<a href=3D"mailto:bdale AT gag DOT com">bdale AT gag DOT com</a>> wrote:<b= r></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border= -left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">"Majenko Technologies (<a href= =3D"mailto:matt AT majenko DOT co DOT uk" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">matt AT ma= jenko.co.uk</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_b= lank" rel=3D"noreferrer">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>]"<br> <<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noref= errer">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>> writes:<br> <br> > So... can anyone give me a quick overview of what's improved in le= pton?<br> > Things I should look for and marvel at?<br> <br> For me, the big win is that released versions of gschem would just crash<br= > from time to time, and had a number of visual "artifacts" when zo= oming<br> in/out, etc... all of which seem to be gone from the current<br> lepton-schematic.=C2=A0 Put differently, to me lepton-schematic is just lik= e<br> gschem but with fewer annoying bugs.<br> <br> It may be that there are better gschem bits in git, but as a<br> distribution package maintainer I *try* to use the released versions I<br> package whenever possible... so I just wouldn't know.<br> <br> The lepton-eda folk were also happy to accept my contribution of a tEDAx<br= > output module for getting data to pcb-rnd sanely, and rolled it into a<br> new release fairly quickly, which I really appreciated as the primary<br> current maintainer of gEDA-related/derived packages in Debian.<br> <br> Bdale<br> </blockquote></div> --0000000000001471be059352d385--
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |