X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
Date:	Tue, 21 May 2019 08:56:09 +0200
From:	mhx AT iae DOT nl
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Cc:	conover AT rahul DOT net
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Hierarchical Design for Spice
In-Reply-To:	<20190521044848.12303.qmail@rahul.net>
References:	<20190520214505 DOT Horde DOT 0UTCvzi8U9NvFR4qkIDRhiq AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 20 DOT 1905202256290 DOT 4674 AT nimbus>
	<20190521044848 DOT 12303 DOT qmail AT rahul DOT net>
Message-ID:	<58940499d7669ed8ad5eabb79e446a57@iae.nl>
X-Sender:	mhx AT iae DOT nl
User-Agent:	Roundcube Webmail/1.2.4
ClaraMail2-Webmail-AuthUser:	mhx AT iae DOT nl
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 2019-05-21 06:48, conover AT rahul DOT net wrote:
> Roland Lutz writes:
>> 
>> Once the hierarchy is working correctly, see here for a SPICE 
>> hierarchy
>> example:
>> http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:example_hsm
>> 
> 
> For an example of a fairly complex, (its analog,) Spice, (ngspice(1),)
> see:
> 
>     http://www.johncon.com/john/c-note/
> 
>     John

Wow! That is a truly impressive piece of work that I must study some 
more.
One question -- I tried to find thiele.mod in that RCS desert, but 
failed.
Are they hidden, or should the older tape archives be hierarchically 
unpacked first?

-marcel

- Raw text -