delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2019/05/19/13:33:10

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
bh=XuZbPiSGKD/lHtn6M3BCI1OVS9s4oJpkUSspq9XHD5I=;
b=DBw5YmYfwrYYHAamnrkZWCp0voy3bNHYDn5YMOUdHGTilHm2kD34wtmExC5Oyl+a78
v1GBrYQnVgECq6dMtPyMQf0qGCYcmpjFH9FtkZL/QbM8IJITaUYtI2MEwy0LBqR33YLA
sJ6lkCyyk+F5CQjRyx/KPLcf7mT2VifEXCI2ZW8CgCEWPBP/O70pOmj2i16fiDcz02k5
wjBitBVCONAhyjU83tomCmswNl8dRaAwoaB88EA7JHNbZcIWBw47tqXZpvQ7/5FFIZrq
Rd/cEDipZt5Berf6krLr5LhGbq20ugYeS9yRwB0QKDV1EA7HwqPC88xIoX9KE7212FoN
SbxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to;
bh=XuZbPiSGKD/lHtn6M3BCI1OVS9s4oJpkUSspq9XHD5I=;
b=YTuij0Fd3SICV/hvsI9S3IpwdzTEsYD00YblPnvR00XkM40W0+w0aDg6NB+RS0rXin
xalNT2IFOjBnNl63bqM9X9yRbwrZpciacrytuRNFEuUyryyOP4HQ/5XYmx83KxS0kYAc
jbsNUNmXD/ayB9bfzt2SwxHd+3jDM5ucrkOg/LJ6OO4XmKczU/yUoPHuZiHsJLSoOaUq
ScO8/+1bv0V2t7Ds+fQ+rX5dEdrBNaQIAvJ4hz6DVWNwscygBrOQ6qD4VsrLVsalsANk
8RBiyEVnXXzPv3ZeHUsAROKw3RF0HsPBm4a2LG6fibtLSqq75fdMK1bWtGn4Ni1sF+Cf
goFA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXJFG1H8mwJ0TWqpl9v0ol0t3QOirjB1wUzbXnTStZ8P0MTJe4e
aw0th2r6iYL6lhX/GLUXtOBAxtrqNPFY7LbRIWlxgQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJ/3o4sYFAy0zJmKR4mKjDyqmVHP3O3cO72KeNa7Ppyf2n5wIy8MOVoC8cjxWVQLweMHlKwZApwDzPABY5lnU=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:1e44:: with SMTP id e65mr20027564ybe.165.1558287048487;
Sun, 19 May 2019 10:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <e226233c-616a-e5f0-9689-1b9080b3e7ad AT q40 DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <e226233c-616a-e5f0-9689-1b9080b3e7ad@q40.de>
From: "Erich Heinzle (a1039181 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2019 03:00:35 +0930
Message-ID: <CAHUm0tMrVKhrosLau0vz_CVsYF5N0qFjqz2HUM-n4kfs+kWWKw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] RS-274D Gerber Conversion
To: geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

--000000000000fbb707058940f9aa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

The now open source tool "pcb elegance" gerber load code appears to cope
with gerber aperture files. You may be able to load up the old gerbers and
aperture files and then attempt export of rs-274x gerbers from pcb elegance.

Once you have rs-274x gerbers, they xan be turned intoa footprint with
translate2geda
or translate2coralEDA for loading into gEDA pcb or into pcb-rnd.

I managed to get pcb elegance running under wine on lubuntu. Their gerber
viewing tool seems to cope better with loading polygonal flashed apertures
than the pcb tool, but this should not be an issue for a 1990s rs-274d
board iiuc.

Failing that, i could try to add the ability to load an aperture file in
conjunction with a gerber file in my utilities translate2geda and
translate2coralEDA (available on github).

translate2coralEDA exports proper padstacks for pcb-rnd with polygonal pad
definitions, allowing round rect, obround, square, rect, circular, etc
pads, which may not be an issue for a 1990s board, but, you may be able to
take advantage of the padstack prototypes in pcb-rnd to add drills to all
padstacks of the same geometry, for example, in one fell swoop, since a
gerber layer will not include drill information.

Good luck!

Erich




On Sun, 19 May 2019 18:18 Derek Stewart (derek AT q40 DOT de) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com], <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have an old computer project designed in the late 1990s, for a 68060
> single board computer, I used to produce, from Gerber files in RS-274D.
> But not many PCB manufacturers use the RS-274D format.
>
> The Gerber files were produced in PCAD for DOS, which I have never found
> an implementation of PCAD, Protel, Tango PCB or Altium Designer to read
> the binary PCB files.
>
> I would like to make some more PCBs, but I only have the RS-274D Gerber
> files, what is hte best way to convert them to RS-274X or more modern
> standard.
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Derek
>

--000000000000fbb707058940f9aa
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">The now open source tool &quot;pcb elegance&quot; gerber =
load code appears to cope with gerber aperture files. You may be able to lo=
ad up the old gerbers and aperture files and then attempt export of rs-274x=
 gerbers from pcb elegance.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">On=
ce you have rs-274x gerbers, they xan be turned intoa footprint with=C2=A0<=
span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">translate2geda or translate2coralEDA =
for loading into gEDA pcb or into pcb-rnd.</span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><b=
r></div><div dir=3D"auto">I managed to get pcb elegance running under wine =
on lubuntu. Their gerber viewing tool seems to cope better with loading pol=
ygonal flashed apertures than the pcb tool, but this should not be an issue=
 for a 1990s rs-274d board iiuc.</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=
=3D"auto">Failing that, i could try to add the ability to load an aperture =
file in conjunction with a gerber file in my utilities translate2geda and t=
ranslate2coralEDA (available on github).</div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><=
div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-family:sans-serif">translate2coralEDA =
exports proper padstacks for pcb-rnd with polygonal pad definitions, allowi=
ng round rect, obround, square, rect, circular, etc pads, which may not be =
an issue for a 1990s board, but, you may be able to take advantage of the p=
adstack prototypes in pcb-rnd to add drills to all padstacks of the same ge=
ometry, for example, in one fell swoop, since a gerber layer will not inclu=
de drill information.</span><br></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font=
-family:sans-serif"><br></span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"font-=
family:sans-serif">Good luck!</span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"=
font-family:sans-serif"><br></span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"f=
ont-family:sans-serif">Erich</span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><span style=3D"f=
ont-family:sans-serif"><br></span></div><div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div di=
r=3D"auto"><br></div></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" =
class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sun, 19 May 2019 18:18 Derek Stewart (<a href=3D"ma=
ilto:derek AT q40 DOT de">derek AT q40 DOT de</a>) [via <a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delor=
ie.com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>], &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:geda-user AT delorie=
.com">geda-user AT delorie DOT com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gm=
ail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-le=
ft:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
I have an old computer project designed in the late 1990s, for a 68060 <br>
single board computer, I used to produce, from Gerber files in RS-274D. <br=
>
But not many PCB manufacturers use the RS-274D format.<br>
<br>
The Gerber files were produced in PCAD for DOS, which I have never found <b=
r>
an implementation of PCAD, Protel, Tango PCB or Altium Designer to read <br=
>
the binary PCB files.<br>
<br>
I would like to make some more PCBs, but I only have the RS-274D Gerber <br=
>
files, what is hte best way to convert them to RS-274X or more modern <br>
standard.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Derek<br>
</blockquote></div>

--000000000000fbb707058940f9aa--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019