X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Message-Id:	<201903081710.x28HAAUG016981@delorie.com>
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=crcomp.net;
	s=dkim; h=Sender:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Message-ID:Cc:MIME-Version:
	Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:
	Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:
	In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
	List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
	bh=yD/NDLKs2M+Xr3x59bkinEF0Qpz4Uq7gmQVZIhyCf0g=; b=HdDDwwLYwBqD0zIuq628zA9s+U
	IpviGzDvTVYOgpahNzKxpugbUHIEYrGTnsoTtER0t4Hoy+xRLEbE12DCc5zPg+4OUzEoplhpgaJv0
	QNVEvKUSWzaVMtn6fnjYpLuR9pA6SY8mMeRqya4DyXUhozrM+Ekjj4t0Se6VtYv436nmnk6DRfIOX
	6szqTK2cUuGF3+in70JNfDw3DDsut4ZVTr2sEubHntW/SNptKQ2L6UDKlMGXm36gjxTicCQBessST
	bdKorXpd65LPT8wuWTiRSdXkvEdisyeA66UcQOOAaZfHD+UEQHSE2yGbK0otUcqVdpN7wdcNVQ2dT
	7ZFohHzQ==;
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.2 cv=XsOKARN9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0
	a=9MP9vxlQrmnoeofDS6o88g==:117 a=cYePNoeIYIZvZZmSUxP4wQ==:17
	a=NTGMnVQrEZIA:10 a=GlmxEaRcyfsA:10 a=WmWdSZijAAAA:8 a=B1_QNwyYAAAA:8
	a=Mj1Xp5F7AAAA:8 a=wvr3w7QxM1WRf5Psq_YA:9 a=TyhwexaRAurJGTW402Pw:22
	a=f3KzUBtQ6mTbyx-YvAwf:22 a=OCttjWrK5_uSHO_3Hkg-:22
Date:	08 Mar 2019 17:10:06 UTC
From:	"(mail AT crcomp DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	<geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	[geda-user] Re: Is FreeRotateBuffer implemented in gschem?
X-EN-UserInfo:	de154d50cc16294658ed7b7577430c21:931c98230c6409dcc37fa7e93b490c27
X-EN-AuthUser:	mail AT crcomp DOT net
Sender:	<mail AT crcomp DOT net>
X-EN-OrigIP:	72.175.2.211
X-EN-OrigHost:	host-72-175-2-211.ljn-co.client.bresnan.net
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2019, (mail AT crcomp DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> gschem displays the dump shown below in its Status window after the
>> FreeRotateBuffer(45) macro is Evaluated. Does this mean that
>> FreeRotateBuffer is not implemented?

<snip>

> FreeRotateBuffer is a PCB, not gschem, action.  You can rotate objects in
> gschem via "E R" or the "rotate-object!" and "rotate-objects!" Scheme
> procedures defined in (geda object).

FreeRotateBuffer allows any degree of rotation, which is more versatile
than "E R"'s fixed 90° rotation. Anyhow, FreeRotateBuffer is not 
implemented in gschem, which answers my question.
    My goal to rotate a zenier diode by 45° in gschem seems unobtainable
at present.

Thank you, 73,

-- 
Don Kuenz KB7RPU
There was a young lady named Bright Whose speed was far faster than light;
She set out one day In a relative way And returned on the previous night.

- Raw text -