delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2019/02/26/17:14:54

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h=
reply-to:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm2; bh=n
ejQxszt0oaNZjj2yEl9U5c40CIdml8VQLLYHZqSkNY=; b=ALW0i3y0s2c86EDJL
5qCx+922vvD0Cmks7pbj6jW4gbTipiN48ifEpP8taQZeHAsq1n6FmqPdxOJyoAYw
rUDH4YNAE0mjNR7J0YSJp4Se8zfsLTF8bfBIe/ew8KRiVE45YjiCiBB2N9J7s2UM
bLSQLgJMRIw3LreiTU6vbi13Z7Aoh7p6mr+3GHcF6sD5i9++Y4gEEIZaujnV3vVt
uNskI8N5nQcdoOzA0reDZ7Fchv0vROmG/iSgdaihZi3nNxVVx2Ii2viaoworUgMr
IGmcqXSFWSYHITP52tndVZ2/KVYN5PxOcfClAV1GD9jTKTikjVHrCNExdtGctSYK
ASd0g==
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
:reply-to:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender
:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=nejQxszt0oaNZjj2yEl9U5c40CIdm
l8VQLLYHZqSkNY=; b=zlnE/23KA+G1dgobv8FjqPnkye/oTG6CnnypHKRGJSM8F
u1Rti9EyfvD5Pn4xBoSbud2aOwNs2o6/nZEMGnlN/mCe9dE1zcfWG5SmhJMuAqtD
ggCQTlq78YjitUPkmG7xq3ZtgE75iU+9tfKAfs0emZ4sjV7i4WpN2dST1QJ7KOkt
DjZ/6+eUNgUSDUxBrDvxZyQsZK93lnZKf0TGkCSch7lV6sc9Tq9N8CDHxaeFDDWh
0Q1lqQnQsevK9OgjwZ7l6N40AROfYYX5/lDfDddcuFUTEAsDCMbw4w5S2vy4W8/9
6RPPqkH+WEt6FUgzh4FR5NGhR1g+kMXtV+4LQzDuw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:4bl1XFMNEh0nysAky9lvG-wkfG7m69nr_Oc6Qt8Rqd_-4WjECb9tzQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrudelgdduieefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpehruffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesth
ekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepifhirhhvihhnucfjvghrrhcuoehghhgvrhhrlhesfhgr
shhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucffohhmrghinhepghgvuggrqdhprhhojhgvtghtrdhorh
hgnecukfhppedutdekrddvudehrdduleehrddvtdehnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr
ohhmpehghhgvrhhrlhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg
eptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:4rl1XCI9EsvYqWS9YkTdGH2TLqFP8z8UV2k2X6o0gZq84hDHJ_oQHg>
<xmx:4rl1XI6x6jlm1KZn5iF5nxeCe59ETUPukDyWKOW7K68_Wu1Xc0HBOA>
<xmx:4rl1XCS2uFwUw793U43ZBpNCopy1AHqDIbb2Elqw3bST42uwEVnYVA>
<xmx:4rl1XE68ifxO4qN_8uJ2jriY7_CQJfoy1Ix5Cjh4rJzyddROXOG36Q>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] graphical not overriding netlister
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <d732710d-761f-1cef-ba17-c0383c82bca1 AT fastmail DOT com>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 20 DOT 1902261254170 DOT 2706 AT nimbus>
<60e8d7b3-2cd3-5610-c1f9-340250db3a13 AT fastmail DOT com>
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 20 DOT 1902262224590 DOT 3938 AT nimbus>
From: "Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID: <4b7c83ed-13ee-0d3e-8efd-3108ad906689@fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:14:04 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902262224590.3938@nimbus>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 2/26/19 1:25 PM, Roland Lutz wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via 
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> I am not sure what or where I can get the "master" branch.
>
> The process of building gEDA/gaf from the repository is explained here:
> http://wiki.geda-project.org/geda:gaf_building_git_version
>
> In short, if you are using Debian, the following commands should do 
> the trick:
>
>   sudo apt-get update
>   sudo apt-get build-dep geda
>   git clone git://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf.git
>   cd geda-gaf
>   ./autogen.sh
>   ./configure --prefix=$HOME/geda
>   make
>   make install
>
>> For some years, I have been lobbying for a new gEDA release, but got 
>> resistance that gEDA is now perfect and does not need any new 
>> development or new releases.
>
> On the contrary, gEDA is far from perfect.
>
> For a long time, the problem was that the repository contained several 
> unfinished features which no-one volunteered to finish. I'm currently 
> working on cleaning things up, removing some parts, finishing other 
> parts myself, so we can have a working release again.  Maybe I'm 
> setting the goal too high here, I don't know. Since most of the 
> critical problems are solved now, I think I'll be able to roll a new 
> release soon(-ish).
>
>> Since there were only four of these terminals giving me problems, my 
>> solution was to re-draw the symbols as a real graphic without any 
>> intelligence, leaving the net node electrically hanging. The net 
>> still has a pull-up resistor connected to it, so it has more than one 
>> node.
>
> That sounds like a good workaround, but what were you trying to do in 
> the first place?
>
> Roland
>
Roland,

That sounds good. It would be nice to have a new gEDA release after all 
this time. Thanks for your effort.

I generally like to install stable releases on my system, rather than 
pull them off the development repository. Adam Osborne, a 1980s 
engineer, was accredited with the anecdote: "He, who lives on the 
cutting edge of technology, gets sliced to bits." I try to follow that 
philosophy because more often than not, whenever I don't, something bad 
happens. However, If I get some time, I will follow your suggestion and 
try it out. I am using Slackware, rather than Debian, but that should 
not be a show-stopper. I generally build packages from source and then 
package them for Slackware installation. If I can get the source, I can 
go with it.

What I was trying to do?
My design uses some push-button switches with redundant connection 
terminals on both sides. One side is mounted to my PCB and the other 
side, I use to wire some BNC jacks to. Since the BNC-connected terminals 
are not part of the PCB, but I want them shown on the schematic as 
connection points for the assembly, I needed the terminal symbols, but 
not have them placed on the PCB design itself. I figured the easiest way 
to keep them off the PCB would be to set the graphical attribute to have 
them ignored. Not!

Thanks Again.
Girvin




- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019