delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Wed, 30 Jan 2019 14:49:54 +0100 (CET) |
X-X-Sender: | igor2 AT igor2priv |
To: | "Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
X-Debug: | to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" |
From: | gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Refdes bug or Master Attribute Document on the Wiki |
needs update. | |
In-Reply-To: | <alpine.DEB.2.20.1901301419360.1543@nimbus> |
Message-ID: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1901301448260.21900@igor2priv> |
References: | <9ed059c0-f3c5-1482-169b-f8f1119f3208 AT fastmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 20 DOT 1901301419360 DOT 1543 AT nimbus> |
User-Agent: | Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Roland Lutz wrote: > In what kind of situation would you want to merge components with individual > refdes' into a single package? Or, spelled differently, why would you want to > assign individual refdes' to a package's components? In some systems this is how you do slotting. Each slot is <refdes>[a..z]. I haven't used such system, but I have seen this convention on schematics produced with those systems.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |