X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType:	repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder:	inbox
From:	karl AT aspodata DOT se
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Equipment
In-reply-to:	<20180903065303.28031.qmail@stuge.se>
References:	<20180902184454 DOT 03C39845C7FD AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20180903065303 DOT 28031 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
Comments:	In-reply-to "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
	message dated "Mon, 03 Sep 2018 06:53:03 -0000."
Mime-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<20180903093347.E3F2D845C7E8@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date:	Mon, 3 Sep 2018 11:33:47 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned:	ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Peter Stuge:
> karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote:
> > I'm contemplating buying an oscilloscope.
> 
> It's a good tool.

Yes:)

I already have a 200HMz analogue one, but I'd like to be able do
single-shot captures.

> > My guess is that for normal analogue and i2c,rs232,spi things I'd
> > be happy with a four channel 200MHz one with suitable triggers.
> 
> I'd suggest a hardware supported by https://sigrok.org/ for digital
> protocols,

Ok, but it seems none of the higher end scopes are supported.

> but having a scope which also has digital inputs is quite
> nice, but usually comes with a relatively hefty pricetag.
...

 This set has it:
https://se.farnell.com/rohde-schwarz/r-s-hmo3054-hoo10-hoo12-hoo14-ho3516/oscilloscope-kit-hmo-complete/dp/2448547
and the price is ok.

> > But I also want to be able to do pre emi/emc certification test.
> > Any suggestion what spec and equipment to use for that...
> 
> Sorry - don't know about that part. I think that's another league,
> quite likely involving a high end spectrum analyzer. (For the
> *un*-expected emissions.)

Yes, according to
 http://www.analog.com/media/en/analog-dialogue/volume-51/number-4/articles/volume51-number4.pdf
page 12, you need a 1 to 6GHz scope for transient analysis.

But I don't think you need a high end spectum analyzer. My guess is 
that something like 10kHz to 6-10GHz would suffice for pre-cert. tests.
you don't need to do everything.

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden

- Raw text -