delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jul 2018 05:16:34 +0200 (CEST) |
X-X-Sender: | igor2 AT igor2priv |
To: | "Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
X-Debug: | to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" |
From: | gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] Thermals: size problem, SMD |
In-Reply-To: | <9f527cf8-d7c0-2b6a-641f-23efb3663ff2@linetec.nl> |
Message-ID: | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1807130514360.8169@igor2priv> |
References: | <9f527cf8-d7c0-2b6a-641f-23efb3663ff2 AT linetec DOT nl> |
User-Agent: | Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, Richard Rasker (rasker AT linetec DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Hello, > > 2: SMD thermals, or the lack thereof. If I really need thermals, I create tiny > rectangles without clearance (S key) to connect pads to the surrounding copper > planes. Already implemented in pcb-rnd for many months. > ('tombstoning'). So is it better to always use home-made thermals? Because > that is a bit of a hassle. Or just use the right software for the task. Best regards, Igor2
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |