delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2018/07/12/08:50:00

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox
From: karl AT aspodata DOT se
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] adventures using arrows (for documentation), or cross my lines
In-reply-to: <1531368952.2286296.1438062920.4E165C0D@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <20180702125528 DOT D32CF81F76FE AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <20180709204944 DOT GA921 AT debian DOT lokolhoz> <1531286153 DOT 3131974 DOT 1436831304 DOT 36E05F01 AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com> <20180711182359 DOT 227FE81F772D AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <1531363092 DOT 2191172 DOT 1437992056 DOT 3A4E875E AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com> <20180712035816 DOT 26F69841DE80 AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <1531368952 DOT 2286296 DOT 1438062920 DOT 4E165C0D AT webmail DOT messagingengine DOT com>
Comments: In-reply-to "Edward Hennessy (ehennes+oss AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
message dated "Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:15:52 -0700."
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20180712124828.9C3488420410@turkos.aspodata.se>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:48:28 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

Ed:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018, at 8:58 PM, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote:
> > Perhaps the only place it is useful to have width = 0 is in filled
> > paths, and I'm guessing that paths are not much used, so one could
> > break compatibility just there without too much breakage.
> 
> Or, maybe, create a separate object for an enhanced path? Leave the old
> "H" path alone. It would provide an opportunity to make a clean break
> and redesign the path object without the breakage.

Yes, fine with me, but my ramblings doesn't matter unless devs are 
willing to accept the ideas and possible patches.

///

Do you people like the idea of the choises below:

a, in H path, 0 width will not be default, instead it will be zero

b, a new path thing, with the above width semantics

c, do nothing

The idea is to be able to do filled paths with easily defined corner
positions, and which can be easily scaled [1] to different sizes ?

Regards,
/Karl Hammar

[1] http://aspodata.se/git/openhw/share/gschem/scale_sym.pl

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57


- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019