Mail Archives: geda-user/2018/02/04/11:36:15
Josef:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2018 at 09:28:13PM +0100, karl AT aspodata DOT se wrote:
...
> > > Thanks for the clarification! Maybe the paragraph could state this more
> > > precisely with an example?
> >
> > Yes, plese give us a new phrasing.
>
> OK, I give it a try. Hope, my bad english won't make it worse =:-()
>
> A special note about units: [ ... ] Note that when multiple variants are listed, the
> most recent (and most preferred) format is the first listed.
>
> The square bracket syntax specifies only the enclosed values as high
> resolution. Whenever child elements need high resolution, they have to use
> square brackets on their own, as in this example:
>
> Symbol['!' 12] # 12 is a high resolution value
> ( # <--- this pair is only for grouping and can never be a square
> SymbolLine[0 4500 0 5000 8] # high resolution
> SymbolLine(0 10 0 35 8) # standard resolution
> )
Why not have directly under 8.8 File Syntax,
general
lines, ws, comments
coordinate system
parameters
the meaning of [] and () around the parameter list
old, new, angles, numeric/symbolic flags, strings
syntax of objects with ( contents ) vs. without
order within a layout file (.pcb)
objects
Arc ...
flags
glossary
and for every object, an example showing its use.
That hole section is generated from src/parse_y.y so changing
the text leads us to read the source.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Aspö Data
Lilla Aspö 148
S-742 94 Östhammar
Sweden
+46 173 140 57
- Raw text -