X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 2 Jan 2018 22:31:01 +0100 (CET)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] why pinnumber in sym pins?
In-Reply-To:	<20180102213205.4565128f84cb6f27ef88033d@gmail.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.20.1801022222590.16512@nimbus>
References:	<20171226122009 DOT 366BF804CEDE AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 20 DOT 1801022021340 DOT 14184 AT nimbus> <20180102213205 DOT 4565128f84cb6f27ef88033d AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> The default then not pinnumber identifier is available could be pinlabel 
> or default could be to used pinnumber but no pinlabel in symbols.
>
> Schematics are read by human so it make sense to use pinlabel as 
> identifier.

Erm...

The pinnumber *is* the identifier.  If you don't like the term 
"pinnumber", call it something else, like "pin identifier".

- Raw text -