X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=jS6/voC+lnteJ4XU+pO2so+9FehUQlo0JMuVnpTjQ+U=;
	b=OIlkKAWgzkswyzJ+VQNJJ+EkyMBCwgiUAE6qhMO/Zav2Sf1qojngOT2N6Z2Ug8xf2a
	v1b6SIAsd+aIJe4l4kJzn8oYRy0qJ97kpncAVrMoXGT4FOmEmQCkmeakAFjF98Qh0lkA
	X8tnSVT30wG6y+c1A8poroXrz2Xd9VYm6k/VqIAVMAs8eUURNSv99KvReZvnu6Ttk/v4
	l8iHitNyOD4YEu/QAN0ftEbaHz69Kn/+gGcq1tk6vtBsKyDi+i77SiUrGlPyn251iga2
	Je7dyBolKXdO3ZRuEl3iSLDneDQgtbnUIljI0JQkFtobvKBzxpfsPtfQRaInercI8sAw
	UbEw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=jS6/voC+lnteJ4XU+pO2so+9FehUQlo0JMuVnpTjQ+U=;
	b=j+vAwi08tWn8XEasH4UXReXTXa6PyW1UxYlD/ECUbc5eYZhNkPe66BB9/lnZyi3DgN
	PXy+Ks7lsn6difxu1fkBDIz1xdvJuVs9O7Zl0MnCu/O88fMOIIsV0T5J0E1N84FwdpW+
	6H5+0VYAOX7+f3wUqHA8zGzV95tKwAtYxqkkyEDjsMmdDkE47+UsLee3DmQ+FMEyy2PB
	wFtzwA2gJVFg+JEZBTrNWqKWlpKImu/ijbaSGKZva4E+B+10pEBLjszCMuYnzPG0CX7s
	u7Bp/rtAhpF4fKSjzlQMfuYnpdEzJyMYl2iGGEBdTGS4CimGe3SYOx559KqYOtHirF0b
	8TUg==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AJaThX4Az8obdS52rAilYuejhm4XNADBEpmNomKFhHrY9bWDdyG4+8gw
	HWqY6l0PSkvsPdtM0bMnYrRl6lrcfVlq86CwqjCwTw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source:	AGs4zMYfRunGsLrB9n754kdzOfi0G4N35GEGcqmI9gPQJC92Ry6QlrAg1xoRkT2rPHO/jpg8wUv3z1+hgLfRnJrW03M=
X-Received:	by 10.202.206.78 with SMTP id e75mr7965365oig.126.1512150847170;
	Fri, 01 Dec 2017 09:54:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<e9595dad-24b6-3507-faba-2c5816c6091c@wellesley.edu>
References:	<e9595dad-24b6-3507-faba-2c5816c6091c AT wellesley DOT edu>
From:	"Bob Paddock (graceindustries AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:54:06 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAOuGh89rp-Z3694-kg9cT3=5FCdw5qNRKCDMNC82N6QV0t8jGw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Including parts in a BOM that are not on the board
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:05 PM, James Battat (jbattat AT wellesley DOT edu)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Do you have recommendations for how to incorporate components into a BOM
> that are not part of the netlist or board layout?.
>was thinking of creating a separate .sch file, e.g. "peripherals.sch" and including it in the BOM generation but not when I "import schematics" in the layout...
>But am curious to know how others handle this.

By not doing it.

The BOM should drive the project of which the schematic is a part, not
the other way around.

In a production/design environment you do not want to have too touch
drawings because some vendor obsoleted PartNumber and replaced it with
PartNumber-A.
This would get really problematic with hidden attributes when visible
dates don't match what might be on a audit record.

The argument frequently then becomes "don't change the visible date"
which later bites you when they *look identical* yet they are
different.
This can get expensive if someone updated the PCB revision, someone
had the old document  (.sch) with the old  PCB rev and same date and
then order out of date boards to the tune of tens of thousands of
dollars, based on the hidden attributes (the BOM in the schematic).

Always avoid having a change ripple through the design files that has
no real impact on other files, yet must be updated.

- Raw text -