X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 4 May 2017 20:42:52 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	"Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gschem crash under x_event_key
In-Reply-To:	<3aae1d42-37e7-7f52-2ebc-d2a7bb4cee57@fastmail.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.20.1705042041060.2305@nimbus>
References:	<CAJXU7q_KSx_cYi_theGTaBe-58JBdkR9cczB3fLAVju-+pfa4w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAMvDHVDs=xi-y-B6GEQj+dz+bh7P21maEs7oBsiAZ3pCUhBzkQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <3aae1d42-37e7-7f52-2ebc-d2a7bb4cee57 AT fastmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--8323329-1354444934-1493923372=:2305
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Thu, 4 May 2017, Girvin Herr (gherrl AT fastmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Not to keep beating a dead horse here, since I have asked this question 
> several times in the past on this forum: when is gEDA-GAF going to be 
> updated and the latest made stable and released?

The problem right now is that there is some half-finished development 
merged into master, and Vladimir made some changes in his fork with which 
I'd like to keep mainline geda-gaf at least compatible.  So there are some 
things which would need to be figured out first:

- What should be done regarding the progress in having dockable gschem 
dialogs?  Is someone willing to finish the work, should it be considered 
“finished” as-is and shipped in a stable release, or should it be moved to 
a feature branch, shipping the last stable UI?

- What should be done regarding the changes in the configuration system? 
The current state is somewhat inconsistent, having both the traditional 
.gafrc-style files and the new geda.conf files at once.  Is someone 
willing to finish the work, should it be considered “stable” as-is and 
released, or should the release have the last stable .gafrc-only 
configuration?

- What changes in Vladimir's code affect interoperability with geda-gaf 
and should be accounted for?

I've been working on the interoperability issue but haven't been able to 
review all changes yet.  (@Vladimir: Documentation of what exactly changed 
would help greatly here. *hint*)

Roland

--8323329-1354444934-1493923372=:2305--

- Raw text -