X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Fri, 17 Feb 2017 10:46:07 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: tEDAx (was: Re: [geda-user] RFC: edacore - should we reboot it?
	the EDA ecosystem) + help needed
In-Reply-To:	<CAJXU7q9GVwZ0eGDzeECh9qQec8MOgpXcCQz6aac+nsq5mmOmBA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1702171042400.7286@igor2priv>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702130818300 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702160811400 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <20170216173319 DOT GA18720 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702161842490 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <20170216183850 DOT GB14699 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAJXU7q9mH_Z8qfJ-f7Ec=TY++K56tujC9Ve9jXcGtbeB4ss3GA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702170410040 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv> <CAJXU7q9GVwZ0eGDzeECh9qQec8MOgpXcCQz6aac+nsq5mmOmBA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

>
>
>On 17 Feb 2017 03:25, <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>
>Finally, why I started to write this mail: I'd like to make statistics
>for the tEDAx web page so I'd like to ask you the same boring question
>for pcb mainline: "yes" or "no" (to this specific thing)? This could
>also cut this thread short.
>
>
>For me, yes - why not.. looks like a sensible enough netlist import format,
>and costs us little to implement. (At some point)

Thank you!

FYI, next tEDAx goal is defining a very simple footprint block. Please let 
me know if you want to join in the design phase.

>Ultimately, it is not my decision of course. The somewhat related questions
>of who will implement it and when are ones I don't currently have answers
>for.

No worries. We don't have deadlines on any of these.

(The only timing issue was that I wanted to avoid ideas getting blocked 
before they born)

Best regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -