X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned:	amavisd-new at neurotica.com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com;
	s=default; t=1487182144;
	bh=H4aUBwN0nFFpEaB/aKuUKY3o7jbjInokjmpUc8VeRE8=;
	h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To;
	b=IZ6gjODMWrlApbsO/QaXDaQ5ejI+0T+0eYMQh5pEHKK5njNv7KsiBS8FdcMQCGsTJ
	j7d0pFKqYa3sA1kEWF78BV2VhlYCjGYWbJ1CvCrsEZ1Hq3rsrxpLN3aOKrjo4bV6vW
	blGM8unkrRs2TUGwbCkJUGueMCoESLqHLypDu81o=
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] We are about to alienate users was -> geda-gaf fork
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<CAM2RGhQQo8_KAb2p4LqSrmSBKYM1hyeRdmzDn3XqeTjxdpFtKw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<C57AF350-004B-4ED2-BABF-B9905DEC294F AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAGde_xNNgXdP4AZpftypFi2W2bt6cZ3qzHTH2+pu96mstyhgzw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<dd4bda14-83a5-1512-d700-15cb111902df AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<8BA67AB8-DB7F-4B97-BB34-CDBF543BE33F AT noqsi DOT com>
From:	"Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<0d7ce81e-5cac-66ea-7231-daebcbd70201@neurotica.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:09:01 -0500
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<8BA67AB8-DB7F-4B97-BB34-CDBF543BE33F@noqsi.com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v1FI96nv004414
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 02/15/2017 12:46 PM, John Doty wrote:
>> That kind of setup would attract more users that don't want to code
>> on the tools, just use them, (and test them…).
>
> I can’t understand why any such users would choose gEDA. It’s like
> someone who hates going outdoors in the cold buying a pair of skis.

   Hogwash!  In fact, I think you'll find most, perhaps nearly all gEDA 
users fall into that category.  YOU don't, and that's ok.

   gEDA has great strengths other than simply "being a toolkit".  In 
fact, it has great strengths that have nothing at all to do with the 
fact that "it's a toolkit".

   John, you consistently see the world through blinders of your own use 
cases, and then you make loud assertions based on that view.  You 
frequently present these assertions in the form of "dad has arrived, all 
of you clueless kids listen up".

   Why?

               -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -