delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Message-ID: | <58A20B5C.2040101@xs4all.nl> |
Date: | Mon, 13 Feb 2017 20:39:08 +0100 |
From: | "Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
User-Agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110429 Fedora/2.0.14-1.fc13 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] geda-gaf fork |
References: | <20170212125923 DOT GF11686 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20170213133638 DOT GB21523 AT foo DOT stuge DOT se> <eb861f95-3aae-45e1-3873-b394242137df AT prochac DOT sk> |
In-Reply-To: | <eb861f95-3aae-45e1-3873-b394242137df@prochac.sk> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Milan Prochac (milan AT prochac DOT sk) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 13.02.2017 14:36, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via > geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >>> we (Peter Brett and me) have decided to continue our work on github >>> and (if DJ doesn't mind) make its sibling repository on geda-project >>> to better collect user contributions. >> I want to applaud this step - I am convinced that this allows for the >> best possible outcome, although exactly what that means still remains >> unknown. >> > > What outcome do you expect if developer effort will be split to > several branches, each with 1-2 developers (and similar number of users)? > > I do not see anything to applaud. > > -m- > >>> it's I hope a fair position. >> I think very much so! As long as you pick a distinct name I think >> this is an enabling step in resolving the knot that our beloved >> projects have been tied up in for a while now. >> >> >> Thanks again, you are doing exactly the right thing >> >> //Peter > > > Hi Milan, Maybe 2 times 45% is much better than a complete stale mate and *nobody* pushing any commits ... I'm not comfortable with how things have panned out either ... probably have no say in these matters ... I can't make decisions for how people spend spare cycles on projects, they choose themselves ... YMMV Kind regards, Bert Timmerman.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |