X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 12 Feb 2017 11:42:54 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: the ecosystem (was: Re: [geda-user] gnetlist chaos)
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1702121105060.2199@nimbus>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1702121140010.7286@igor2priv>
References:	<D0E30DB4-3ADF-415C-A95E-B58F09AE054D AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1702111609100 DOT 25113 AT nimbus> <CAJXU7q_ogjTmEOjruGJ3od-GYdv_gef0X_yc7Fne1q6kDu1xrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <0D03FED9-A309-4F6C-9863-0EC6DB35176D AT noqsi DOT com> <20170211182330 DOT GO21523 AT foo DOT stuge DOT se>
	<FA6FF0F2-6850-4B55-A19F-A343CB8762A9 AT noqsi DOT com> <20170211205800 DOT GB14489 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <CAM2RGhQxatfsMJ=MpUUyyhcU9-1wzapE319CSiBzuJB9DLCxpQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20170212091821 DOT GB450 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1702121040590 DOT 7286 AT igor2priv>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1702121105060 DOT 2199 AT nimbus>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, Roland Lutz wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>> or we wait for some magic "everyone uses this common protocol/file 
>> format/API/lib/mechanism" and have the first solution to offer in 
>> t=infinite. (I strongly believe users won't wait till t=infinite.)
>
> I don't think that would even work.  Projects tend to have strongly diverging


Sorry, it _does_ work in fact. We can even do ltspice -> pcb-rnd now. It's 
a working flow. Doesn't look exactly the same as gschem -> pcb-rnd, but is 
a totally working, useful flow.

Same for tinycad -> pcb-rnd, that one works even better. Tinycad now can 
fully replace gschem in this flow.

You may say you don't like this approach, you may say this would be hard 
long term, or other approaches could work better. Or you can of course say 
it wouldn't work when it already does work in practice, but... ;)

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -