X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding
	:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=ddQQ3tgPp/ZDE1bXJriPDwSXTEyGb/FQZFGL+wBUQks=;
	b=lNAWAfh52l38+9m7On7BHCU0kkcWMFgVxPibP3j8PVhtrSxeyiQ++8hR522h1PeIem
	kOoluicBae8Njn3Eg6cX8rveMu187VjIzECd4Ksq13Z3JVU0EQJr+H6GDgLPhGKo4iwl
	cercJHzMK7l+9DEVWjEUPFbWFdWwb9jbtN2Iu/xJbNyfCQUgRaYHMWhdfdg9EVgV8zQC
	g73Ij0VmvW8Q5Bn8WjVAc2NaAd/mm6gfceNag18HiEixAATaijzRIxN6aHNWnViYovv6
	BGiY64F0bwu6O2XKGtHr459DcVgdQ+a17WccOgPMwJmHErzGytuLTZclI/HIPzQEE+20
	nOEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to
	:references:mime-version:content-disposition
	:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent;
	bh=ddQQ3tgPp/ZDE1bXJriPDwSXTEyGb/FQZFGL+wBUQks=;
	b=nwNjuxCJXUaD7prVX9/8g0g34Q5LwdKdq6F5gkPcY0HBMq/4vVHyhvN4HnjJJB+rpl
	JcMR4h1BqAfEzAqgVZ7l/GjLaBgcao1tdh0VoKVVs6Sz11o1TWOWnYA1hNLC+UW06a56
	jV4NTXcIhauYdtDQXBKAG+35DBnJTC5jSE9+2sg4XH1y+2C+zzbQLQw+YD+TdGRNCv/q
	EKONdbEjF/eqv9VUKE85qrT+rtcckxqtgDeBvrOVAwspDdxM4I0JmH5DtBzcoYAbUmyO
	4fIF2m++wG9OJYznQ0MYmrVjQh6KXS5crLtpzMyZQNFlNn9wDCH7HVkN4PhFohihfrjc
	ORqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AMke39lF5W33KVBtlYsD0StiWw0HLqJpHoSfG1lkq17Wmj/8en5OgYp2EwfZl6NN4mpK8A==
X-Received:	by 10.25.40.4 with SMTP id o4mr5241672lfo.1.1486890072194;
	Sun, 12 Feb 2017 01:01:12 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:01:09 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gnetlist chaos
Message-ID:	<20170212090109.GA450@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<D0E30DB4-3ADF-415C-A95E-B58F09AE054D AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1702111609100 DOT 25113 AT nimbus>
	<CAJXU7q_ogjTmEOjruGJ3od-GYdv_gef0X_yc7Fne1q6kDu1xrg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAJXU7q_ogjTmEOjruGJ3od-GYdv_gef0X_yc7Fne1q6kDu1xrg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 03:59:28PM +0000, Peter Clifton (petercjclifton AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> On 11 February 2017 at 15:09, Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 11 Feb 2017, John Doty wrote:
> >
> >> I wish Roland would not call his program gnetlist.
> >>
> >
> > It is gnetlist.  Why call it by a different name?
> >
> 
> 
> The xorn netlist invocation is "gnetlist2". "gnetlist" is still the same,
> runs scheme back-ends etc.. (as usual).

It was so before the commit
http://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/commit/?id=acb41e99cd3c6b58add04313504a989d6cfcd68e

Roland pushed it just after I stated clearly on the list that I'll
work on C/Scheme part and gnetlist refactoring and actually started it:

http://git.geda-project.org/geda-gaf/commit/?id=ee29aa57a0b348fb7f1a42d7664abfeb2fe4a2df

I tried xorn several times but it broke my work with REPL and
rc-configuration (you know I use several scripts in Scheme, some
of which have been published on github). Requiring to use some
variable in rc-files to enable "old gnetlist" behaviour is a "good
step" by Roland to effectively hide it from users because some of
them just don't know of it and some are lazy.

I didn't want a fight and leaved things as is until we have a
consensus on how to collaborate further.

> 
> 
> > It’s based on a completely new foundation (“xorn”: don’t ask me what that
> >> is or what it does, it’s very murky to me).
> >>
> >
> >
> Probably best to look at what it is before passing comment. As I understand
> it, none of the existing gEDA code is actually impacted by this - it is a
> parallel tool.

See above. The first point is good anyway. Though I would like you
to follow it, too ;-)

-- 
  Vladimir

- Raw text -